Joël Cline

1.3k total citations
20 papers, 622 citations indexed

About

Joël Cline is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Joël Cline has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 622 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Atmospheric Science, 12 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 7 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in Joël Cline's work include Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (13 papers), Climate variability and models (9 papers) and Energy Load and Power Forecasting (7 papers). Joël Cline is often cited by papers focused on Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (13 papers), Climate variability and models (9 papers) and Energy Load and Power Forecasting (7 papers). Joël Cline collaborates with scholars based in United States, Norway and Spain. Joël Cline's co-authors include David P. Wisegarver, R. H. Gammon, James M. Wilczak, Irina V. Djalalova, Melinda Marquis, Joseph B. Olson, Laura Bianco, Catherine A. Finley, Larry K. Berg and William J. Shaw and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Monthly Weather Review and Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.

In The Last Decade

Joël Cline

20 papers receiving 573 citations

Peers

Joël Cline
Anna C. Fitch United States
William Y. Y. Cheng United States
Catherine A. Finley United States
Tara Jensen United States
Irina V. Djalalova United States
David B. Gilhousen United States
Joël Cline
Citations per year, relative to Joël Cline Joël Cline (= 1×) peers María Luisa Martín

Countries citing papers authored by Joël Cline

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joël Cline's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joël Cline with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joël Cline more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joël Cline

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joël Cline. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joël Cline. The network helps show where Joël Cline may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joël Cline

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joël Cline. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joël Cline based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joël Cline. Joël Cline is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Banta, Robert M., Yelena L. Pichugina, W. Alan Brewer, et al.. (2023). Measurements and Model Improvement: Insight into NWP Model Error Using Doppler Lidar and Other WFIP2 Measurement Systems. Monthly Weather Review. 151(12). 3063–3087. 4 indexed citations
2.
Shaw, William J., Larry K. Berg, Joël Cline, et al.. (2019). The Second Wind Forecast Improvement Project (WFIP2): General Overview. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 100(9). 1687–1699. 59 indexed citations
3.
4.
Wilczak, James M., Joseph B. Olson, Irina V. Djalalova, et al.. (2019). Data assimilation impact of in situ and remote sensing meteorological observations on wind power forecasts during the first Wind Forecast Improvement Project (WFIP). Wind Energy. 22(7). 932–944. 19 indexed citations
5.
Haupt, Sue Ellen, Branko Kosović, William J. Shaw, et al.. (2019). On Bridging A Modeling Scale Gap: Mesoscale to Microscale Coupling for Wind Energy. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 100(12). 2533–2550. 68 indexed citations
6.
Mirocha, Jeffrey D., Matthew Churchfield, Domingo Muñoz‐Esparza, et al.. (2018). Large-eddy simulation sensitivities to variations of configuration and forcing parameters in canonical boundary-layer flows for wind energy applications. Wind energy science. 3(2). 589–613. 26 indexed citations
7.
Mirocha, Jeffrey D., Matthew Churchfield, Domingo Muñoz‐Esparza, et al.. (2017). Large-Eddy Simulation Sensitivities to Variations of Configuration and Forcing Parameters in Canonical Boundary-Layer Flows for Wind Energy Applications. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 2 indexed citations
8.
Banta, Robert M., Yelena L. Pichugina, W. Alan Brewer, et al.. (2017). Evaluating and Improving NWP Forecast Models for the Future: How the Needs of Offshore Wind Energy Can Point the Way. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 99(6). 1155–1176. 23 indexed citations
9.
Pichugina, Yelena L., Robert M. Banta, Joseph B. Olson, et al.. (2017). Assessment of NWP Forecast Models in Simulating Offshore Winds through the Lower Boundary Layer by Measurements from a Ship-Based Scanning Doppler Lidar. Monthly Weather Review. 145(10). 4277–4301. 20 indexed citations
10.
Giebel, Gregor, Joël Cline, Helmut Frank, et al.. (2016). Wind power forecasting: IEA Wind Task 36 & future research issues. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 753. 32042–32042. 5 indexed citations
11.
Djalalova, Irina V., Joseph B. Olson, Jacob R. Carley, et al.. (2016). The POWER Experiment: Impact of Assimilation of a Network of Coastal Wind Profiling Radars on Simulating Offshore Winds in and above the Wind Turbine Layer. Weather and Forecasting. 31(4). 1071–1091. 12 indexed citations
12.
Bianco, Laura, Irina V. Djalalova, James M. Wilczak, et al.. (2016). A Wind Energy Ramp Tool and Metric for Measuring the Skill of Numerical Weather Prediction Models. Weather and Forecasting. 31(4). 1137–1156. 38 indexed citations
13.
Orwig, K., Mark Ahlstrom, V. Banunarayanan, et al.. (2014). Recent Trends in Variable Generation Forecasting and Its Value to the Power System. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy. 6(3). 924–933. 79 indexed citations
14.
Wilczak, James M., Catherine A. Finley, Joël Cline, et al.. (2014). The Wind Forecast Improvement Project (WFIP): A Public–Private Partnership Addressing Wind Energy Forecast Needs. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 96(10). 1699–1718. 84 indexed citations
15.
Draxl, Caroline, et al.. (2013). Advancements in Wind Integration Study Data Modeling: The Wind Integration National Dataset (WIND) Toolkit; Preprint. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 1 indexed citations
16.
Orwig, K., et al.. (2012). Enhanced Short-Term Wind Power Forecasting and Value to Grid Operations. 4 indexed citations
17.
Cline, Joël. (2002). Surface-based rain, wind, and pressure fields in tropical cyclones over North Carolina since 1989. 3 indexed citations
18.
Cline, Joël, et al.. (1991). The Objective Use of Observed and Forecast Thickness Values to Predict Precipitation Type in North Carolina. Weather and Forecasting. 6(4). 456–469. 26 indexed citations
19.
Gammon, R. H., Joël Cline, & David P. Wisegarver. (1982). Chlorofluoromethanes in the northeast Pacific Ocean: Measured vertical distributions and application as transient tracers of upper ocean mixing. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 87(C12). 9441–9454. 128 indexed citations
20.
Cline, Joël, et al.. (1970). Estimation of clubbing by analysis of shadowgraph.. BMJ. 3(5713). 43–43. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026