Joe Wolf

1.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 832 citations indexed

About

Joe Wolf is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Joe Wolf has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 832 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 3 papers in Instrumentation and 1 paper in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Joe Wolf's work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (6 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (6 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (3 papers). Joe Wolf is often cited by papers focused on Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (6 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (6 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (3 papers). Joe Wolf collaborates with scholars based in United States. Joe Wolf's co-authors include Manoj Kaplinghat, James S. Bullock, Marla Geha, Gregory D. Martinez, Joshua D. Simon, Ricardo R. Muñoz, Stacy McGaugh, Erik Tollerud, Evan N. Kirby and Louis E. Strigari and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union.

In The Last Decade

Joe Wolf

6 papers receiving 810 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Accurate masses for dispersion-supported galaxies

2010 472 citations Joe Wolf, Gregory D. Martinez et al. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Joe Wolf United States	5	805	348	243	34	18	6	832
Camilla Penzo Germany	10	728 0.9×	382 1.1×	204 0.8×	42 1.2×	15 0.8×	10	757
J. S. Dunlop United Kingdom	14	706 0.9×	333 1.0×	185 0.8×	15 0.4×	31 1.7×	20	716
C. Fedeli Italy	16	613 0.8×	228 0.7×	228 0.9×	20 0.6×	24 1.3×	24	620
S. Eales United Kingdom	12	791 1.0×	282 0.8×	124 0.5×	19 0.6×	24 1.3×	20	797
G. B. Lima Neto Brazil	18	819 1.0×	300 0.9×	230 0.9×	54 1.6×	21 1.2×	53	837
A. Ortiz‐Gil Spain	9	577 0.7×	195 0.6×	197 0.8×	18 0.5×	19 1.1×	20	599
Alexey Voevodkin Russia	5	516 0.6×	183 0.5×	180 0.7×	22 0.6×	12 0.7×	6	529
C. R. Mullis United States	18	931 1.2×	353 1.0×	267 1.1×	32 0.9×	15 0.8×	30	939
D. S. Reed United Kingdom	6	489 0.6×	154 0.4×	214 0.9×	37 1.1×	6 0.3×	7	499
Sergey Mashchenko Canada	8	700 0.9×	239 0.7×	259 1.1×	47 1.4×	10 0.6×	16	734

Countries citing papers authored by Joe Wolf

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joe Wolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joe Wolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joe Wolf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joe Wolf

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joe Wolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joe Wolf. The network helps show where Joe Wolf may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joe Wolf

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joe Wolf. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joe Wolf based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joe Wolf. Joe Wolf is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Simon, Joshua D., Marla Geha, Quinn E. Minor, et al.. (2011). A COMPLETE SPECTROSCOPIC SURVEY OF THE MILKY WAY SATELLITE SEGUE 1: THE DARKEST GALAXY. The Astrophysical Journal. 733(1). 46–46. 171 indexed citations

2.

Wolf, Joe, Gregory D. Martinez, James S. Bullock, et al.. (2010). Accurate masses for dispersion-supported galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. no–no. 472 indexed citations breakdown →

3.

Bullock, James S., Kyle R. Stewart, Manoj Kaplinghat, Erik Tollerud, & Joe Wolf. (2010). STEALTH GALAXIES IN THE HALO OF THE MILKY WAY. The Astrophysical Journal. 717(2). 1043–1053. 44 indexed citations

4.

McGaugh, Stacy & Joe Wolf. (2010). LOCAL GROUP DWARF SPHEROIDALS: CORRELATED DEVIATIONS FROM THE BARYONIC TULLY-FISHER RELATION. The Astrophysical Journal. 722(1). 248–261. 83 indexed citations

5.

Kalirai, Jason S., Rachael L. Beaton, Marla Geha, et al.. (2010). THE SPLASH SURVEY: INTERNAL KINEMATICS, CHEMICAL ABUNDANCES, AND MASSES OF THE ANDROMEDA I, II, III, VII, X, AND XIV DWARF SPHEROIDAL GALAXIES^,. The Astrophysical Journal. 711(2). 671–692. 61 indexed citations

6.

Wolf, Joe. (2009). Modeling mass independent of anisotropy: A comparison between Andromeda and Milky Way satellites. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union. 5(H15). 79–79. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact