Joe T. Mok
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 5%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering top 10%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Co-authors
- Benjamin J. EggletonC. Martijn de SterkeIan C. M. LittlerJustin L. BlowsE. N. TsoyDavid MossJ. Nathan KutzMartin Rochette
- Topics
- Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (16 papers)Quantum optics and atomic interactions (8 papers)Optical Network Technologies (6 papers)
- Cited by
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and OpticsStatistical and Nonlinear PhysicsAcoustics and Ultrasonics
- Journals
- NatureNature PhysicsOptics Letters
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Joe T. Mok
16 papers receiving 479 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 422
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 381
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 105
- Biomedical Engineering 26
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 17
Countries citing papers authored by Joe T. Mok
This map shows the geographic impact of Joe T. Mok's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joe T. Mok with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joe T. Mok more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joe T. Mok
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joe T. Mok. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joe T. Mok. The network helps show where Joe T. Mok may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joe T. Mok
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joe T. Mok. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joe T. Mok based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joe T. Mok. Joe T. Mok is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 201 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 31 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 32 | |
| 10 | 74 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 40 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 33 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 9 |
About Joe T. Mok
Joe T. Mok is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 18 papers that have together received 492 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (16 papers), Quantum optics and atomic interactions (8 papers) and Optical Network Technologies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (422 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (105 citations) and Acoustics and Ultrasonics (6 citations). Joe T. Mok has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin J. Eggleton, C. Martijn de Sterke, Ian C. M. Littler, Justin L. Blows, E. N. Tsoy, David Moss, J. Nathan Kutz, Martin Rochette, J. A. Bolger and M. Ibsen. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Nature Physics and Optics Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.