João Canotilho
- Materials Chemistry top 10%
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry top 1%
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Pharmaceutical Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- M. Ermelinda S. EusébioRicardo A. E. CastroManuela Ramos SilvaTeresa M. R. MariaΑ. Matos BejaJ.S. RedinhaMário T. S. RosadoRui M. Barbosa
- Topics
- Crystallography and molecular interactions (25 papers)Crystallization and Solubility Studies (22 papers)Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (20 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaChemistry of MaterialsGreen Chemistry
In The Last Decade
João Canotilho
47 papers receiving 767 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Materials Chemistry 493
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 390
- Organic Chemistry 253
- Spectroscopy 109
- Pharmaceutical Science 98
Countries citing papers authored by João Canotilho
This map shows the geographic impact of João Canotilho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by João Canotilho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites João Canotilho more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by João Canotilho
This network shows the impact of papers produced by João Canotilho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by João Canotilho. The network helps show where João Canotilho may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of João Canotilho
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of João Canotilho. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of João Canotilho based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with João Canotilho. João Canotilho is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 37 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About João Canotilho
João Canotilho is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Organic Chemistry and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, having authored 48 papers that have together received 781 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crystallography and molecular interactions (25 papers), Crystallization and Solubility Studies (22 papers) and Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (390 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (98 citations) and Materials Chemistry (493 citations). João Canotilho has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, France and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include M. Ermelinda S. Eusébio, Ricardo A. E. Castro, Manuela Ramos Silva, Teresa M. R. Maria, Α. Matos Beja, J.S. Redinha, Mário T. S. Rosado, Rui M. Barbosa, Mário J. F. Calvete and J.A. Paixão. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Chemistry of Materials and Green Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.