Joanne Williams
- Oceanography top 2%
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Atmospheric Science top 5%
- Earth-Surface Processes top 5%
- Ecology
- Co-authors
- Philip WoodworthSarah WakelinR. A. FlatherKevin HorsburghChristopher W. HughesSvetlana JevrejevaRobert N. ProctorGnr Forteath
- Topics
- Climate variability and models (21 papers)Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (15 papers)Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesPoland
In The Last Decade
Joanne Williams
31 papers receiving 758 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Oceanography 491
- Global and Planetary Change 429
- Atmospheric Science 338
- Earth-Surface Processes 121
- Ecology 64
Countries citing papers authored by Joanne Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Joanne Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joanne Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joanne Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joanne Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joanne Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joanne Williams. The network helps show where Joanne Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joanne Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joanne Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joanne Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joanne Williams. Joanne Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 35 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 36 | |
| 11 | 49 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 105 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | Re-analysis of the December 1981 storm surge event in the Bristol Channel using the current operational tide-surge model suite | 1 |
| 19 | 37 | |
| 20 | 55 |
About Joanne Williams
Joanne Williams is a scholar working on Oceanography, Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 33 papers that have together received 779 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Climate variability and models (21 papers), Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (15 papers) and Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oceanography (491 citations), Global and Planetary Change (429 citations) and Atmospheric Science (338 citations). Joanne Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Philip Woodworth, Sarah Wakelin, R. A. Flather, Kevin Horsburgh, Christopher W. Hughes, Svetlana Jevrejeva, Robert N. Proctor, Gnr Forteath, M. E. Tamisiea and Phil Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Geophysical Research Letters and Marine Ecology Progress Series.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.