Jo‐Anne Chuck

412 total citations
22 papers, 303 citations indexed

About

Jo‐Anne Chuck is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Jo‐Anne Chuck has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 303 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Molecular Biology, 7 papers in Pharmacology and 6 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Jo‐Anne Chuck's work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (7 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (3 papers) and Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (2 papers). Jo‐Anne Chuck is often cited by papers focused on Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (7 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (3 papers) and Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (2 papers). Jo‐Anne Chuck collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Denmark. Jo‐Anne Chuck's co-authors include Kevin D. Barrow, Jasmina Nikodinović‐Runić, T. J. Millar, Chaitan Khosla, David E. Cane, John R. Jacobsen, Hai Huang, Penny von Wettstein‐Knowles, Michael J. McPherson and Johan G. Olsen and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Biochemistry and Analytical Biochemistry.

In The Last Decade

Jo‐Anne Chuck

21 papers receiving 289 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jo‐Anne Chuck Australia 9 163 127 43 41 37 22 303
Thomas H. O’Hare United States 11 174 1.1× 119 0.9× 71 1.7× 43 1.0× 16 339
Andrew D. Kern United States 5 296 1.8× 52 0.4× 35 0.8× 75 1.8× 6 371
Laura Cascales Australia 6 347 2.1× 37 0.3× 83 1.9× 61 1.5× 8 386
Cathleen A. Cantwell United States 8 240 1.5× 139 1.1× 36 0.8× 44 1.1× 8 308
Oleksandr Yushchuk Ukraine 13 255 1.6× 248 2.0× 47 1.1× 67 1.6× 33 367
Sonja Billerbeck Netherlands 11 377 2.3× 31 0.2× 40 0.9× 43 1.0× 28 476
Shun-ichi Akiyama Japan 12 247 1.5× 95 0.7× 34 0.8× 63 1.5× 45 340
М. А. Хомутов Russia 11 256 1.6× 52 0.4× 23 0.5× 12 0.3× 39 307
Edna Bode Germany 9 212 1.3× 88 0.7× 85 2.0× 26 0.6× 16 342
K.N. Rao India 9 208 1.3× 18 0.1× 46 1.1× 47 1.1× 13 304

Countries citing papers authored by Jo‐Anne Chuck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo‐Anne Chuck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo‐Anne Chuck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo‐Anne Chuck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo‐Anne Chuck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo‐Anne Chuck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo‐Anne Chuck. The network helps show where Jo‐Anne Chuck may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jo‐Anne Chuck

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jo‐Anne Chuck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jo‐Anne Chuck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jo‐Anne Chuck. Jo‐Anne Chuck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jones, Christopher E., T. J. Millar, & Jo‐Anne Chuck. (2019). Development of a Rubric for Identifying and Characterizing Work-Integrated Learning Activities in Science Undergraduate Course.. 20(4). 351–364. 1 indexed citations
2.
Acuña, Tina, Malcolm Campbell, Jo‐Anne Chuck, et al.. (2016). WIL in Science: Leadership for WIL Final project report 2015 – 2016. Monash University Research Portal (Monash University). 2 indexed citations
3.
Millar, T. J., et al.. (2015). Using Biotinylated Proteins to Demonstrate Immunodetection of Antigens via Western Blotting, Dot Blots, and Immunohistochemistry. Methods in molecular biology. 151–164. 2 indexed citations
5.
Schüett, Burkhardt S., et al.. (2014). Determining if active learning through a formative assessment process translates to better performance in summative assessment. Studies in Higher Education. 41(9). 1595–1611. 12 indexed citations
6.
Chuck, Jo‐Anne, et al.. (2013). Teaching and Evaluating Graduate Attributes in Science Based Disciplines. Creative Education. 4(7). 42–49. 16 indexed citations
7.
Millar, T. J., et al.. (2012). The use of biotin to demonstrate immunohistochemistry, western blotting, and dot blots in university practical classes. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. 40(4). 246–253. 6 indexed citations
8.
Chuck, Jo‐Anne. (2011). Hypothetical biotechnology companies: A role‐playing student centered activity for undergraduate science students. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. 39(2). 173–179. 8 indexed citations
9.
Dennis, Gary R., et al.. (2010). Rainwater Tank Water Quality Testing in Western Sydney Australia. 46. 4048–4058. 2 indexed citations
10.
Nikodinović‐Runić, Jasmina, et al.. (2008). Community structure and antibiotic production of Streptomyces nodosus bioreactors cultured in liquid environments. Microbial Biotechnology. 1(5). 373–381. 4 indexed citations
11.
Chuck, Jo‐Anne, et al.. (2006). Amplification of DNA Encoding Entire Type I Polyketide Synthase Domains and Linkers from Streptomyces Species. Current Microbiology. 53(2). 89–94. 4 indexed citations
12.
Millar, T. J., et al.. (2005). Viability analysis of alginate encapsulated micro-organisms using fluorescent stains. Journal of Microencapsulation. 22(7). 787–792. 8 indexed citations
13.
Chuck, Jo‐Anne & Lauren J. Young. (2004). A Cohort-Driven Assessment Task for Scientific Report Writing. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 13(3). 367–376. 6 indexed citations
14.
Nikodinović‐Runić, Jasmina, Kevin D. Barrow, & Jo‐Anne Chuck. (2003). High frequency transformation of the Amphotericin-producing bacterium Streptomyces nodosus. Journal of Microbiological Methods. 55(1). 273–277. 18 indexed citations
15.
Chuck, Jo‐Anne, Michael J. McPherson, Hai Huang, et al.. (1997). Molecular recognition of diketide substrates by a β-ketoacyl-acyl carrier protein synthase domain within a bimodular polyketide synthase. Chemistry & Biology. 4(10). 757–766. 37 indexed citations
17.
Chuck, Jo‐Anne & K. D. Barrow. (1995). The isolation of isoagathenediol: a new tricyclic diterpene from the lipids of Rhodospirillum rubrum. Microbiology. 141(10). 2659–2663. 8 indexed citations
18.
Ramachandran, Lakshmi, Savitri Sharma, Padmaja Sankaridurg, et al.. (1995). Examination of the conjunctival microbiota after 8 hours of eye closure.. PubMed. 21(3). 195–9. 25 indexed citations
19.
Siggaard‐Andersen, Marie‐Louise, Margit Wissenbach, Jo‐Anne Chuck, et al.. (1994). The fabJ-encoded beta-ketoacyl-[acyl carrier protein] synthase IV from Escherichia coli is sensitive to cerulenin and specific for short-chain substrates.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 91(23). 11027–11031. 31 indexed citations
20.
Barrow, Kevin D. & Jo‐Anne Chuck. (1990). Determination of hopanoid levels in bacteria using high-performance liquid chromatography. Analytical Biochemistry. 184(2). 395–399. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026