Joanna Golus
About
In The Last Decade
Joanna Golus
13 papers receiving 314 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Food Science 95
- Molecular Biology 93
- Organic Chemistry 76
- Plant Science 70
- Epidemiology 36
Countries citing papers authored by Joanna Golus
This map shows the geographic impact of Joanna Golus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joanna Golus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joanna Golus more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joanna Golus
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joanna Golus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joanna Golus. The network helps show where Joanna Golus may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joanna Golus
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joanna Golus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joanna Golus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joanna Golus. Joanna Golus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | |
| 2 | 36 | |
| 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 41 | |
| 6 | Antituberculosis Activity of Propolis | 1 |
| 7 | 33 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 66 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 45 | |
| 13 | 10 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.