Joanie Thelen

29 papers receiving 431 citations

Peers

Joanie Thelen
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 191
  • Family Practice 16
  • Neurology 73
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 66
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 15
Replace Carol J. Schramke with:
Carol J. Schramke United States
Eben S. Schwartz United States
Mark Sullivan United States
Natalie Timberlake United Kingdom
Howard L. Field United States
Margaret Cadden United States
Fiona Barwick United States
Rachel Galioto United States
Kelly R. Murphy United States
John DeLuca United States
Joanie Thelen relative to Carol J. Schramke United States Carol J. Schramke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Carol J. Schramke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joanie Thelen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joanie Thelen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joanie Thelen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joanie Thelen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joanie Thelen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joanie Thelen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joanie Thelen. The network helps show where Joanie Thelen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joanie Thelen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joanie Thelen Line = papers co-authored together Joanie Thelen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201760
2 201453
3 202043
4 202034
5 202126
6 201522
7 202019
8 201818
9
Polypharmacy in Multiple Sclerosis: Current Knowledge and Future Directions.
202118
10 201916
11 201815
12 202014
13 201713
14 201912
15 202011
16 201711
17 201511
18 201810
19 20196
20 20215

About Joanie Thelen

Joanie Thelen is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Neurology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 439 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (13 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (8 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (3 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers) and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (191 citations), Family Practice (16 citations), Neurology (73 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (66 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (15 citations). Joanie Thelen has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jared M. Bruce, Sharon Lynch, Amanda S. Bruce, Lauren B. Strober, Laura M. Hancock, Ashley N. Clausen, Joan M. McDowd, Laura E. Martin, Robin L. Aupperle and Erin Guty. Their work appears in journals such as Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Journal of Behavioral Medicine, Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology and British Journal of Sports Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact