Joana L. Rocha
About
In The Last Decade
Joana L. Rocha
7 papers receiving 99 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Genetics 41
- Ecology 31
- Molecular Biology 26
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 24
- Ecological Modeling 13
Countries citing papers authored by Joana L. Rocha
This map shows the geographic impact of Joana L. Rocha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joana L. Rocha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joana L. Rocha more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joana L. Rocha
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joana L. Rocha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joana L. Rocha. The network helps show where Joana L. Rocha may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joana L. Rocha
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joana L. Rocha. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joana L. Rocha based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joana L. Rocha. Joana L. Rocha is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 20 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 46 | |
| 7 | 5 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.