Joan E. Rosenfield
- Atmospheric Science top 0.5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 0.5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Oceanography top 10%
- Environmental Engineering
- Co-authors
- Paul A. NewmanM. R. SchoeberlEric R. NashDavid B. ConsidineLeslie R. LaitCharles H. JackmanJoel SusskindD. Reuter
- Topics
- Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (48 papers)Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (39 papers)Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (34 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresGeophysical Research LettersJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Joan E. Rosenfield
51 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Atmospheric Science 2.7k
- Global and Planetary Change 2.3k
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 510
- Oceanography 64
- Environmental Engineering 63
Countries citing papers authored by Joan E. Rosenfield
This map shows the geographic impact of Joan E. Rosenfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan E. Rosenfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan E. Rosenfield more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joan E. Rosenfield
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan E. Rosenfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan E. Rosenfield. The network helps show where Joan E. Rosenfield may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joan E. Rosenfield
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joan E. Rosenfield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joan E. Rosenfield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joan E. Rosenfield. Joan E. Rosenfield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 35 | |
| 2 | Comparison of modeled and observed stratospheric springtime maxima | 4 |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 36 | |
| 5 | 29 | |
| 6 | 303 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 472 | |
| 9 | 179 | |
| 10 | 44 | |
| 11 | 167 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 298 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 60 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 177 | |
| 20 | The GLAS physical inversion method for analysis of HIRS2/MSU sounding data | 9 |
About Joan E. Rosenfield
Joan E. Rosenfield is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 51 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (48 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (39 papers) and Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (34 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (2.7k citations), Global and Planetary Change (2.3k citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (510 citations). Joan E. Rosenfield has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Paul A. Newman, M. R. Schoeberl, Eric R. Nash, David B. Considine, Leslie R. Lait, Charles H. Jackman, Joel Susskind, D. Reuter, Eric L. Fleming and A. R. Douglass. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Geophysical Research Letters and Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.