Joan Copjec
Impact in
-
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Gothic Literature and Media Analysis
Papers in
-
- Crime and Detective Fiction Studies 1
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism 1
-
- Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics 4
- Co-authors
- Michael SorkinRosalind KraussAnnette MichelsonDenis HollierJacques LacanJeffrey MehlmanStephen HeathTeresa de Lauretis
- Journals
- October (7 papers)differences (2 papers)Psychoanalysis and History (1 paper)Angelaki (1 paper)Oxford Literary Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Joan Copjec
18 papers receiving 347 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Literature and Literary Theory 143
- Cultural Studies 96
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 55
- Clinical Psychology 192
- Philosophy 100
Countries citing papers authored by Joan Copjec
This map shows the geographic impact of Joan Copjec's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan Copjec with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan Copjec more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joan Copjec
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan Copjec. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan Copjec. The network helps show where Joan Copjec may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Joan Copjec, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 34 | |
| 8 | Giving Ground: The Politics of Propinquity | 1999 | 39 |
| 9 | Supposing the subject | 1994 | 41 |
| 10 | Read my desire : Lacan against the historicists Hit paper breakdown → | 1994 | 277 |
| 11 | Read my desire | 1994 | 20 |
| 12 | 1991 | 19 | |
| 13 | 1989 | 15 | |
| 14 | 1989 | 28 | |
| 15 | Television . Dossier on the institutional debate | 1987 | 1 |
| 16 | 1986 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1984 | 0 | |
| 18 | 1984 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1982 | 6 | |
| 20 | 1981 | 5 |
About Joan Copjec
Joan Copjec is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Clinical Psychology, Religious studies, Philosophy and Cultural Studies, having authored 25 papers that have together received 630 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (4 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (3 papers), Islamic Studies and History (2 papers), Crime and Detective Fiction Studies (1 paper), Spanish History and Politics (1 paper), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (1 paper), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (1 paper) and Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (143 citations), Cultural Studies (96 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (55 citations), Clinical Psychology (192 citations) and Philosophy (100 citations). Joan Copjec has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Sorkin, Rosalind Krauss, Annette Michelson, Denis Hollier, Jacques Lacan, Jeffrey Mehlman, Stephen Heath, Teresa de Lauretis, Gertrud Koch and Elizabeth Cowie. Their work appears in journals such as October, differences, Psychoanalysis and History, Angelaki and Oxford Literary Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.