This map shows the geographic impact of Joan Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan Cooper more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan Cooper. The network helps show where Joan Cooper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joan Cooper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joan Cooper.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joan Cooper based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Joan Cooper. Joan Cooper is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Burgess, Lois, et al.. (2009). A longitudinal study of the use of the web by regional tourism organisations (RTOs) in Australia. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 519–531.5 indexed citations
2.
Burgess, Lois, et al.. (2008). Optimising User Acceptance of Mandated Mobile Health Systems (MHS): The ePOC (Electronic Point-of-Care) Project Experience. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 45.5 indexed citations
3.
Cooper, Joan & Robyn Davidson. (2005). Electronic Service Quality Gaps in the Australian Wine Industry. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 23.2 indexed citations
4.
Vatanasakdakul, Savanid, et al.. (2004). What prevent B2B eCommerce adoption in developing countries?: a socio-cultural perspective. Research Online (University of Wollongong).26 indexed citations
5.
Win, Khin Than & Joan Cooper. (2004). Information Age, electronic Health Record and Australia Healthcare. The International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management. 12(3). 14–21.4 indexed citations
6.
Win, Khin Than, Peter Croll, & Joan Cooper. (2003). Privacy, Confidentiality and Consent of Electronic Health Record Systems. 65.4 indexed citations
7.
Soar, Jeffrey, et al.. (2003). Changes in GP Workflow Associated with E-consent and Access Control to Remote Patient Clinical Information. 348.
8.
Win, Khin Than, Peter Croll, & Joan Cooper. (2003). Dependability: Important Factor for the Success of Electronic Health Record Systems. 36.2 indexed citations
9.
Cooper, Joan, et al.. (2002). A MODEL FOR SELF-SIMILAR SEARCH IN IMAGE DATABASE WITH SCARS. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 518–527.1 indexed citations
10.
Burgess, Lois, et al.. (2002). Are Business Websites Complying with Government Privacy Legislation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 5.
11.
Win, Khin Than, et al.. (2001). Issues of Privacy, Confidentiality and Access in Electronic Health Records. 12(1). 24.4 indexed citations
12.
Cooper, Joan, et al.. (2001). e-Business Adoption by Manufacturing SMEs in Regional Australia. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 16.6 indexed citations
13.
Burgess, Lois, et al.. (2001). The Adoption of the Web as a Marketing Tool by Regional Tourism Associations (RTAs) in Australia. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.22 indexed citations
Cooper, Joan, Diane Donovan, & Jennifer Seberry. (1991). Latin squares and critical sets of minimal size. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 4. 113–120.32 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.