Jo Law

413 citations
14 papers · 312 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Jo Law

12 papers receiving 286 citations

Peers

Jo Law
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 233
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 83
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 48
  • Social Psychology 72
  • Artificial Intelligence 105
Replace Patricia L. Tenpenny with:
Patricia L. Tenpenny United States
Terrence M. Barnhardt United States
Peter Blouw Canada
Gilbert Remillard United States
Noah D. Forrin Canada
Erwin M. Segal United States
Harlan D. Harris United States
Caspar Addyman United Kingdom
Vencislav Popov United States
Michael D. Dorken Canada
Jo Law relative to Patricia L. Tenpenny United States Patricia L. Tenpenny's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Patricia L. Tenpenny · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jo Law

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Law's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Law with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Law more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Law

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Law. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Law. The network helps show where Jo Law may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Jo Law, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jo Law Line = papers co-authored together Jo Law links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1988154
2 198859
3 198840
4 198822
5 199319
6
A Study of Global Hospital Websites for Accessibility Compliance
20176
7 20225
8 20222
9
100 Atmospheres: Studies in Scale and Wonder
20192
10 20051
11 20121
12
Enchanting Materialities: e-textiles installations for an ecosophic world
20201
13
Wong Kar-wai's Cinema: Analogues of Experience
20010
14 20220

About Jo Law

Jo Law is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Museology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Materials Chemistry, having authored 14 papers that have together received 312 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory Processes and Influences (4 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (3 papers), Crafts, Textile, and Design (3 papers), Topic Modeling (2 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (1 paper), Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (1 paper), Museums and Cultural Heritage (1 paper) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (233 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (83 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (48 citations), Social Psychology (72 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (105 citations). Jo Law has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Endel Tulving, Nobuo Ohta, Steven A. Sloman, Lars‐Göran Nilsson, C. A. Gordon Hayman, et al., Bradford H. Challis, Andrew P. Yonelinas, Joanne Kuzma and Nigel Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Animation, Memory, Metrologia and Transformation An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact