Jo Bates

1.2k total citations
42 papers, 764 citations indexed

About

Jo Bates is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Food Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Jo Bates has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 764 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 8 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 8 papers in Food Science. Recurrent topics in Jo Bates's work include Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (8 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (6 papers) and E-Government and Public Services (6 papers). Jo Bates is often cited by papers focused on Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (8 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (6 papers) and E-Government and Public Services (6 papers). Jo Bates collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Nigeria. Jo Bates's co-authors include Yuwei Lin, Paul Clough, Jahna Otterbacher, Alessandro Checco, Jennifer Rowley, Helen Kennedy, Pamela Abbott, Gianluca Demartini, Jun Zhang and Peter A. Bath and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Chromatography A and Pure and Applied Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Jo Bates

38 papers receiving 692 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jo Bates United Kingdom	14	212	188	142	104	98	42	764
Gregory S. Dawson United States	12	127 0.6×	89 0.5×	66 0.5×	69 0.7×	88 0.9×	32	620
Marisa Ponti Sweden	12	168 0.8×	41 0.2×	48 0.3×	111 1.1×	38 0.4×	43	742
Elías Sanz Casado Spain	19	106 0.5×	132 0.7×	32 0.2×	155 1.5×	13 0.1×	113	1.0k
Yixiao Li China	15	315 1.5×	31 0.2×	143 1.0×	67 0.6×	33 0.3×	43	775
William Isaac United States	9	199 0.9×	55 0.3×	157 1.1×	99 1.0×	294 3.0×	15	742
Meredith Lawley Australia	19	232 1.1×	31 0.2×	40 0.3×	44 0.4×	12 0.1×	66	1.1k
M. Sirajul Islam Sweden	14	148 0.7×	143 0.8×	47 0.3×	269 2.6×	12 0.1×	32	826
Karol Król Poland	14	219 1.0×	54 0.3×	23 0.2×	78 0.8×	41 0.4×	134	667
Samia Khan Canada	15	123 0.6×	32 0.2×	14 0.1×	97 0.9×	33 0.3×	59	1.0k
Christine Stilwell South Africa	17	83 0.4×	31 0.2×	22 0.2×	306 2.9×	22 0.2×	81	826

Countries citing papers authored by Jo Bates

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Bates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Bates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Bates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Bates

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Bates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Bates. The network helps show where Jo Bates may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jo Bates

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jo Bates. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jo Bates based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jo Bates. Jo Bates is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Bates, Jo, et al.. (2025). Feeding the machine: Practitioner experiences of efforts to overcome AI's data dilemma. Big Data & Society. 12(4).

Kennedy, Helen, et al.. (2024). How people connect fairness and equity when they talk about data uses. Big Data & Society. 11(4).

Kennedy, Helen, et al.. (2024). What ifs: The role of imagining in people’s reflections on data uses. Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 30(6). 2025–2041. 1 indexed citations

Bates, Jo, et al.. (2023). Socially meaningful transparency in data-based systems: reflections and proposals from practice. Journal of Documentation. 80(1). 54–72. 7 indexed citations

Bates, Jo, et al.. (2023). Addressing labour exploitation in the data science pipeline: views of precarious US-based crowdworkers on adversarial and co-operative interventions. Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society. 21(3). 342–357. 2 indexed citations

Zhang, Jun, Jo Bates, & Pamela Abbott. (2022). State-steered smartmentality in Chinese smart urbanism. Urban Studies. 59(14). 2933–2950. 20 indexed citations

Bates, Jo, et al.. (2021). Potential opportunities and risks of sharing agricultural research data in Tanzania. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 45(3-4). 8 indexed citations

Kennedy, Helen, et al.. (2021). Public Understanding and Perceptions of Data Practices:A Review of Existing Research. CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School). 5 indexed citations

Bath, Peter A., et al.. (2019). ‘Someone like me’: User experiences of the discussion forums of non-12-step alcohol online support groups, June 2019. Addictive Behaviors. 98. 106028–106028. 12 indexed citations

10.

Otterbacher, Jahna, Jo Bates, & Paul Clough. (2017). Competent Men and Warm Women. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 6620–6631. 72 indexed citations

11.

Bates, Jo. (2017). The politics of data friction. Journal of Documentation. 74(2). 412–429. 50 indexed citations

12.

Walker, Janine & Jo Bates. (2015). Developments in LGBTQ provision in secondary school library services since the abolition of Section 28. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 48(3). 269–283. 4 indexed citations

13.

Bates, Jo. (2014). The strategic importance of information policy for the contemporary neoliberal state: The case of Open Government Data in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly. 31(3). 388–395. 99 indexed citations

14.

Bates, Jo. (2013). Information policy in the crises of neoliberalism: the case of Open Government Data in the UK. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 2 indexed citations

15.

Bates, Jo. (2012). “This is what modern deregulation looks like” : co-optation and contestation in the shaping of the UK’s Open Government Data Initiative. The Journal of Community Informatics. 8(2). 89 indexed citations

16.

Bates, Jo. (2000). Health and environmental hazard classification of pesticides. Pesticide Outlook. 11(3). 109–115. 2 indexed citations

17.

Bates, Jo. (1990). The prediction of pesticide residues in crops by the optimum use of existing data (IUPAC reports on pesticides no. 26). Pure and Applied Chemistry. 62(2). 337–350. 9 indexed citations

18.

Bates, Jo & S. Gorbach. (1987). Recommended approach to the appraisal of risks to consumers from pesticide residues in crops and food commodities. Pure and Applied Chemistry. 59(4). 611–624. 6 indexed citations

19.

Bates, Jo. (1979). The evaluation of pesticide residues in food: Procedures and problems in setting maximum residues limits. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 30(4). 401–416. 4 indexed citations

20.

Bates, Jo. (1960). STUDIES ON A NIGERIAN FOREST SOIL. Journal of Soil Science. 11(2). 246–256. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact