J.M. Jonker

811 total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 609 citations indexed

About

J.M. Jonker is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Physiology and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, J.M. Jonker has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 609 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology, 3 papers in Physiology and 2 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in J.M. Jonker's work include Frailty in Older Adults (4 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (3 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers). J.M. Jonker is often cited by papers focused on Frailty in Older Adults (4 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (3 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers). J.M. Jonker collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands. J.M. Jonker's co-authors include Marije E. Hamaker, Carolien H. Smorenburg, Alinda G. Vos, Barbara C. Van Munster, Evert de Jonge, Carlos Gil Ferreira, Paul van der Valk, Giuseppe Giaccone, Frank A.E. Kruyt and Pieter E. Postmus and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet Oncology, Annals of Oncology and British journal of surgery.

In The Last Decade

J.M. Jonker

6 papers receiving 598 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Frailty screening methods for predicting outcome of a comprehensive geriatric assessment in elderly patients with cancer: a systematic review

2012 463 citations Marije E. Hamaker, J.M. Jonker et al. The Lancet Oncology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J.M. Jonker Netherlands	6	334	236	187	121	102	6	609
Chie Akiba United States	5	333 1.0×	195 0.8×	223 1.2×	131 1.1×	60 0.6×	7	597
Marika Rasschaert Belgium	12	209 0.6×	153 0.6×	261 1.4×	109 0.9×	74 0.7×	32	545
Christophe Desauw France	8	212 0.6×	143 0.6×	305 1.6×	209 1.7×	51 0.5×	27	603
Eric T. Lubiner United States	5	457 1.4×	246 1.0×	422 2.3×	244 2.0×	56 0.5×	9	858
I. Boler United States	5	463 1.4×	257 1.1×	388 2.1×	219 1.8×	48 0.5×	8	832
J.P. Jacquin France	8	211 0.6×	209 0.9×	215 1.1×	106 0.9×	27 0.3×	12	512
J.-F. Geay France	6	169 0.5×	106 0.4×	176 0.9×	84 0.7×	38 0.4×	15	479
Laëtitia Stefani France	12	137 0.4×	95 0.4×	275 1.5×	200 1.7×	43 0.4×	30	637
Regina Gironés Spain	16	150 0.4×	98 0.4×	313 1.7×	273 2.3×	68 0.7×	47	666
Reena Jayani United States	10	272 0.8×	161 0.7×	226 1.2×	102 0.8×	45 0.4×	39	562

Countries citing papers authored by J.M. Jonker

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.M. Jonker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.M. Jonker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.M. Jonker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.M. Jonker

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.M. Jonker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.M. Jonker. The network helps show where J.M. Jonker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.M. Jonker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.M. Jonker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.M. Jonker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J.M. Jonker. J.M. Jonker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Jonker, J.M., et al.. (2014). Geriatric oncology in the Netherlands: a survey of medical oncology specialists and oncology nursing specialists. European Journal of Cancer Care. 23(6). 803–810. 14 indexed citations

2.

Hamaker, Marije E., J.M. Jonker, Huub Maas, et al.. (2014). The geriatricians’ perspectives on geriatric oncology in the Netherlands – results of a national survey. European Geriatric Medicine. 5(4). 265–269. 7 indexed citations

3.

Glas, Nienke A. de, J.M. Jonker, Esther Bastiaannet, et al.. (2014). Impact of omission of surgery on survival of older patients with breast cancer. British journal of surgery. 101(11). 1397–1404. 24 indexed citations

4.

Hamaker, Marije E., J.M. Jonker, Evert de Jonge, et al.. (2012). Frailty screening methods for predicting outcome of a comprehensive geriatric assessment in elderly patients with cancer: a systematic review. The Lancet Oncology. 13(10). e437–e444. 463 indexed citations breakdown →

5.

Jonker, J.M., et al.. (2012). Colon cancer treatment and adherence to national guidelines: Does age still matter?. Journal of Geriatric Oncology. 3(2). 131–137. 9 indexed citations

6.

Ferreira, Carlos Gil, Paul van der Valk, Simone W. Span, et al.. (2001). Assessment of IAP (inhibitor of apoptosis) proteins as predictors of response to chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Annals of Oncology. 12(6). 799–805. 92 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact