J.M. Hurwitz

702 citations
17 papers · 440 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

J.M. Hurwitz

16 papers receiving 408 citations

Peers

J.M. Hurwitz
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Reproductive Medicine 127
  • Political Science and International Relations 125
  • Communication 35
  • Gender Studies 47
  • Sociology and Political Science 208
Replace Ben Saunders with:
Ben Saunders United Kingdom
Andrea Tone United States
Francesco Serri Italy
Bruce Whitehouse United States
Paul Saurette Canada
Janet L. Dolgin United States
Peter Glasner United Kingdom
Jocelynne A. Scutt United Kingdom
Rachel Harrison United Kingdom
Lisa Sowle Cahill United States
J.M. Hurwitz relative to Ben Saunders United Kingdom Ben Saunders's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Ben Saunders · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.M. Hurwitz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.M. Hurwitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.M. Hurwitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.M. Hurwitz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.M. Hurwitz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.M. Hurwitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.M. Hurwitz. The network helps show where J.M. Hurwitz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside J.M. Hurwitz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.M. Hurwitz Line = papers co-authored together J.M. Hurwitz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2005231
2 200340
3 201136
4 200429
5 201227
6 200926
7 200818
8 20029
9 20076
10 20075
11 20054
12 20083
13 20182
14
Endometrial Ablation for Aplastic Anemia-Associated Menorrhagia.
20152
15 20051
16 20081
17 20250

About J.M. Hurwitz

J.M. Hurwitz is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Immunology and Molecular Biology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 440 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (8 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (6 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (5 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (4 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (3 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (2 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (127 citations), Political Science and International Relations (125 citations), Communication (35 citations), Gender Studies (47 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (208 citations). J.M. Hurwitz has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Nanette Santoro, Arthur L. Caplan, Sangita Jindal, Frances R. Batzer, Jeffery J. Mondak, Lubna Pal, Keri Greenseid, Nanette Santoro, Andrew I. Brooks and Dara S. Berger. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, Public Opinion Quarterly, Reproductive Sciences, Seminars in Reproductive Medicine and Journal of Emergency Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact