J.M. Haigh
- Pharmaceutical Science top 1%
- Dermatology top 2%
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Inorganic Chemistry top 10%
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Eric W. SmithIsadore KanferDavid A. ThorntonChristian SurberLuigi R. NassimbeniMino R. CairaChristopher J. StubbsR.J. Gochin
- Topics
- Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (17 papers)Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (15 papers)Dermatology and Skin Diseases (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- South AfricaUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
J.M. Haigh
51 papers receiving 756 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Pharmaceutical Science 292
- Dermatology 227
- Organic Chemistry 152
- Inorganic Chemistry 132
- Pharmacology 110
Countries citing papers authored by J.M. Haigh
This map shows the geographic impact of J.M. Haigh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.M. Haigh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.M. Haigh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J.M. Haigh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.M. Haigh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.M. Haigh. The network helps show where J.M. Haigh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.M. Haigh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.M. Haigh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.M. Haigh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J.M. Haigh. J.M. Haigh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 64 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | Assessing Penetration Enhancers for Topical Corticosteroids | 1 |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | In vitro systems for the assessment of drug release from topical formulations and trans-membrane permeation | 7 |
| 13 | Potency ranking of two new topical corticosteroid creams containing 0.1% desonide or 0.05% halometasone utilising the human skin blanching assay. | 2 |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 52 | |
| 16 | 39 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 19 |
About J.M. Haigh
J.M. Haigh is a scholar working on Pharmaceutical Science, Dermatology and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 51 papers that have together received 808 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (17 papers), Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (15 papers) and Dermatology and Skin Diseases (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (292 citations), Dermatology (227 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (132 citations). J.M. Haigh has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Eric W. Smith, Isadore Kanfer, David A. Thornton, Christian Surber, Luigi R. Nassimbeni, Mino R. Caira, Christopher J. Stubbs, R.J. Gochin, Georgios Imanidis and Erin L. Meyer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chromatography A, International Journal of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.