This map shows the geographic impact of A Bataillard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Bataillard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Bataillard more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A Bataillard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A Bataillard. The network helps show where A Bataillard may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A Bataillard
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A Bataillard.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A Bataillard based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A Bataillard. A Bataillard is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fervers, Béatrice, Julien Carretier, & A Bataillard. (2010). Clinical practice guidelines. Journal of Visceral Surgery. 147(6). e341–e349.17 indexed citations
Raynard, Bruno, A Bataillard, Jocelyne Meuric, et al.. (2006). Bonnes pratiques pour la prise en charge diététique en cancérologie : la nutrition entérale (rapport abrégé). Bulletin du Cancer. 93(7). 715–722.3 indexed citations
Claude, L., C. Carrié, N. Breteau, et al.. (2005). Recommandations pour la pratique clinique : Standards, Options 2004 pour la prise en charge des patients atteints d’ostéosarcome, Mise à jour 2004 du chapitre radiothérapie, Validation du rapport initial : mars 1995,1 ère validation de la mise à jour du chapitre radiothérapie : décembre 1998, 2 e validation de la mise à jour du chapitre radiothérapie : septembre 2004. Bulletin du Cancer. 92(10). 891–906.4 indexed citations
8.
Claude, L., C. Carrié, N. Breteau, et al.. (2005). [Standards and Options for the use of radiation therapy in the management of patients with osteosarcoma. Update 2004].. PubMed. 92(10). 891–906.6 indexed citations
Voigt, Jean‐Jacques, A Bataillard, Jean‐Michel Coindre, et al.. (2003). [Clinical practice guidelines: Standards, Options and Recommendations for the diagnosis of carcinomas of unknown primary site].. PubMed. 90(12). 1071–96.15 indexed citations
12.
Resbeut, M., É. Fondrinier, Béatrice Fervers, et al.. (2003). [Standards, Options and Recommendations for the management of invasive cervical cancer patients (non metastastic)].. PubMed. 90(4). 333–46.12 indexed citations
13.
Bugat, R., A Bataillard, Thierry Lesimple, et al.. (2002). [Standards, Options and Recommendations for the management of patient with carcinoma of unknown primary site].. PubMed. 89(10). 869–75.17 indexed citations
Resbeut, M., É. Fondrinier, Béatrice Fervers, et al.. (2001). Carcinoma of the cervix. British Journal of Cancer. 84(s2). 24–30.2 indexed citations
16.
Fervers, Bèatrice, Jennifer Hardy, M P Blanc-Vincent, et al.. (2001). SOR: project methodology. British Journal of Cancer. 84(s2). 8–16.41 indexed citations
17.
Brémond, Alain, A Bataillard, L. Thomas, et al.. (2001). Cancer of the endometrium. British Journal of Cancer. 84(s2). 31–36.26 indexed citations
Spaëth, Dominique, Christian Marchal, A Bataillard, & M P Blanc-Vincent. (1999). Updating 1999 of Standards, Options and Recommendations (SOR) for the clinical use of erythropoietin in oncology. Bulletin du Cancer. 86(7).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.