J-J.Ch. Meyer

501 total citations
33 papers, 192 citations indexed

About

J-J.Ch. Meyer is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Computer Networks and Communications. According to data from OpenAlex, J-J.Ch. Meyer has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 192 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 5 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics and 4 papers in Computer Networks and Communications. Recurrent topics in J-J.Ch. Meyer's work include Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (18 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (12 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (12 papers). J-J.Ch. Meyer is often cited by papers focused on Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (18 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (12 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (12 papers). J-J.Ch. Meyer collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Italy. J-J.Ch. Meyer's co-authors include Frank Dignum, Wiebe van der Hoek, Roel Wieringa, Mehdi Dastani, Leendert van der Torre, Jan H. Hulstijn, M. Birna van Riemsdijk, John‐Jules Ch. Meyer, Virginia Dignum and B. van Linder and has published in prestigious journals such as Lecture notes in computer science, Acta Informatica and Artificial Intelligence and Law.

In The Last Decade

J-J.Ch. Meyer

32 papers receiving 175 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J-J.Ch. Meyer Netherlands 7 172 33 24 23 21 33 192
Frithjof Dau Australia 6 78 0.5× 30 0.9× 38 1.6× 34 1.5× 9 0.4× 17 119
Roswitha Bardohl Germany 5 86 0.5× 20 0.6× 67 2.8× 12 0.5× 24 1.1× 15 147
Rob Miller United Kingdom 8 190 1.1× 33 1.0× 24 1.0× 54 2.3× 8 0.4× 18 235
Camilla Schwind France 10 219 1.3× 68 2.1× 20 0.8× 28 1.2× 8 0.4× 32 243
Alexander Bochman Israel 9 253 1.5× 100 3.0× 8 0.3× 28 1.2× 9 0.4× 39 273
Javier Pinto Chile 7 230 1.3× 20 0.6× 24 1.0× 65 2.8× 14 0.7× 8 245
Mizuho Iwaihara Japan 6 78 0.5× 9 0.3× 38 1.6× 50 2.2× 15 0.7× 33 126
Theo Dirk Meijler Switzerland 6 123 0.7× 9 0.3× 122 5.1× 35 1.5× 23 1.1× 12 174
Manuel Koch Germany 6 109 0.6× 22 0.7× 96 4.0× 34 1.5× 23 1.1× 12 185
Ulrich Furbach Germany 8 118 0.7× 47 1.4× 15 0.6× 25 1.1× 3 0.1× 42 163

Countries citing papers authored by J-J.Ch. Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J-J.Ch. Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J-J.Ch. Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J-J.Ch. Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J-J.Ch. Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J-J.Ch. Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J-J.Ch. Meyer. The network helps show where J-J.Ch. Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J-J.Ch. Meyer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J-J.Ch. Meyer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J-J.Ch. Meyer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J-J.Ch. Meyer. J-J.Ch. Meyer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Meyer, J-J.Ch., et al.. (2012). Testing the Benefits of Structured Argumentation in Multi-Agent Deliberation Dialogues. Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University). 6 indexed citations
2.
Meyer, J-J.Ch., et al.. (2009). A coordination language for agents interacting in distributed plan-execute cycles. International Journal of Reasoning-based Intelligent Systems. 1(1/2). 4–4. 1 indexed citations
3.
Dignum, Frank, et al.. (2008). Magic Agents: Using Information Relevance to Control Autonomy. 889–890. 1 indexed citations
4.
Aldewereld, Huib, Frank Dignum, & J-J.Ch. Meyer. (2005). Proving Norm Compliancy of Protocols in Electronic Institutions. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 3 indexed citations
5.
Diggelen, Jurriaan van, et al.. (2005). Optimal Communication Vocabularies and Heterogeneous Ontologies. Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University). 76–90. 6 indexed citations
6.
Diggelen, Jurriaan van, et al.. (2004). Optimal communication vocubularies in the presence of heterogeneous ontologies. Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University). 3 indexed citations
7.
Dignum, Virginia, J-J.Ch. Meyer, Hans Weigand, & Frank Dignum. (2002). An organization-oriented model for agent systems. Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University). 1 indexed citations
8.
Dastani, Mehdi, et al.. (2002). Programming the Deliberation Cycle of Cognitive Robots. Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University). 22–28. 4 indexed citations
9.
Hindriks, Koen V., Frank S. de Boer, Wiebe van der Hoek, & J-J.Ch. Meyer. (1999). An operational semantics for the single agent core of AGENT0. Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University). 3 indexed citations
10.
Linder, B. van, J-J.Ch. Meyer, & Wiebe van der Hoek. (1997). Formalizing motivational attitudes of agents using the KARO framework. Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University). 2 indexed citations
11.
Gaag, Linda C. van der & J-J.Ch. Meyer. (1996). The dynamics of probabilistic structural relevance. Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University). 1 indexed citations
12.
Hoek, Wiebe van der & J-J.Ch. Meyer. (1996). A Complete Epistemic Logic for Multiple Agents: Combining Distributed and Common Knowledge. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 15 indexed citations
13.
Gaag, Linda C. van der & J-J.Ch. Meyer. (1996). Characterizing normal forms for informational independence. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 2 indexed citations
14.
Meyer, J-J.Ch., Roelf J. Wieringa, & Frank Dignum. (1996). The Role of Deontic Logic in the Specification of Information Languages. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1 indexed citations
15.
Meyer, J-J.Ch. & Frank Dignum. (1994). The Paradoxes of Deontic Logic Revisited: A Computer Science Perspective (Or: Should computer scientists be bothered by the concerns of philosophers?). Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 6 indexed citations
16.
Linder, B. van, Wiebe van der Hoek, & J-J.Ch. Meyer. (1994). Actions that Make you Change your Mind --- Belief Revision in an Agent-Oriented Setting. Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University). 2 indexed citations
17.
Linder, B. van, Wiebe van der Hoek, & J-J.Ch. Meyer. (1994). Tests as epistemic updates - pursuit of knowledge. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 2 indexed citations
18.
Hoek, Wiebe van der, B. van Linder, & J-J.Ch. Meyer. (1993). Unravelling nondeterminism: On having the ability to choose. Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University). 2 indexed citations
19.
Bakker, J. W. de & J-J.Ch. Meyer. (1987). Order and metric in the stream semantics of elemental concurrency. Acta Informatica. 24(5). 491–511. 6 indexed citations
20.
Bergstra, J.A. & J-J.Ch. Meyer. (1982). Equational specifications of finite minimal unoids, using unary hidden functions only. Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026