B. van Linder

783 total citations
13 papers, 148 citations indexed

About

B. van Linder is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, B. van Linder has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 148 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 2 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics and 1 paper in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in B. van Linder's work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (8 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (7 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (4 papers). B. van Linder is often cited by papers focused on Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (8 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (7 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (4 papers). B. van Linder collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands. B. van Linder's co-authors include Wiebe van der Hoek, John-Jules Meyer, John‐Jules Ch. Meyer, J-J.Ch. Meyer and Frank Dignum and has published in prestigious journals such as Artificial Intelligence, Data & Knowledge Engineering and Mathematical Social Sciences.

In The Last Decade

B. van Linder

12 papers receiving 127 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
B. van Linder Netherlands 6 144 23 13 10 9 13 148
Włodzimierz Rabinowicz Sweden 8 104 0.7× 38 1.7× 3 0.2× 45 4.5× 8 0.9× 13 149
Joseph Rosenzweig United States 7 294 2.0× 11 0.5× 2 0.2× 3 0.3× 4 0.4× 10 308
Tomohiro Hoshi United States 6 216 1.5× 90 3.9× 2 0.2× 20 2.0× 9 1.0× 15 229
Michał Marcińczuk Poland 8 171 1.2× 6 0.3× 10 0.8× 1 0.1× 8 0.9× 30 188
Bryan Renne Netherlands 9 147 1.0× 35 1.5× 6 0.6× 5 0.6× 19 161
Michael Dorna Germany 10 172 1.2× 9 0.4× 20 1.5× 2 0.2× 1 0.1× 26 188
Isabelle Tellier France 5 49 0.3× 5 0.2× 2 0.2× 9 0.9× 2 0.2× 21 78
Marie Duží Czechia 7 177 1.2× 77 3.3× 6 0.5× 46 4.6× 5 0.6× 56 246
Sam Alxatib United States 5 46 0.3× 28 1.2× 2 0.2× 16 1.6× 4 0.4× 9 89
Sten Lindström Sweden 7 133 0.9× 54 2.3× 1 0.1× 28 2.8× 5 0.6× 22 174

Countries citing papers authored by B. van Linder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B. van Linder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. van Linder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. van Linder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B. van Linder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. van Linder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. van Linder. The network helps show where B. van Linder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. van Linder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. van Linder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. van Linder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with B. van Linder. B. van Linder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Meyer, John-Jules, Wiebe van der Hoek, & B. van Linder. (1999). A logical approach to the dynamics of commitments. Artificial Intelligence. 113(1-2). 1–40. 70 indexed citations
2.
Hoek, Wiebe van der, B. van Linder, & John-Jules Meyer. (1999). Group knowledge is not always distributed (neither is it always implicit). Mathematical Social Sciences. 38(2). 215–240. 17 indexed citations
3.
Linder, B. van, Wiebe van der Hoek, & John-Jules Meyer. (1998). Formalising Abilities and Opportunities of Agents. Fundamenta Informaticae. 34(1-2). 53–101. 27 indexed citations
4.
Linder, B. van, J-J.Ch. Meyer, & Wiebe van der Hoek. (1997). Formalizing motivational attitudes of agents using the KARO framework. Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University). 2 indexed citations
5.
Linder, B. van, Wiebe van der Hoek, & John-Jules Meyer. (1997). Seeing Is Believing. Journal of Logic Language and Information. 6(1). 33–61. 5 indexed citations
6.
Linder, B. van, Wiebe van der Hoek, & John-Jules Meyer. (1997). The dynamics of default reasoning. Data & Knowledge Engineering. 21(3). 317–346. 2 indexed citations
7.
Dignum, Frank & B. van Linder. (1996). Modelling rational agents in a dynamic environment: Putting humpty dumpty together again. Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University). 81–92. 3 indexed citations
8.
Linder, B. van. (1995). A dynamic logic of iterated belief change. Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University). 1 indexed citations
9.
Hoek, Wiebe van der, B. van Linder, & John-Jules Meyer. (1995). Unravelling nondeterminism: on having the ability to choose (extended abstract). 163–172. 5 indexed citations
10.
Linder, B. van, Wiebe van der Hoek, & John‐Jules Ch. Meyer. (1994). Tests as epistemic updates. European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 331–335. 10 indexed citations
11.
Linder, B. van, Wiebe van der Hoek, & J-J.Ch. Meyer. (1994). Actions that Make you Change your Mind --- Belief Revision in an Agent-Oriented Setting. Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University). 2 indexed citations
12.
Linder, B. van, Wiebe van der Hoek, & J-J.Ch. Meyer. (1994). Tests as epistemic updates - pursuit of knowledge. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 2 indexed citations
13.
Hoek, Wiebe van der, B. van Linder, & J-J.Ch. Meyer. (1993). Unravelling nondeterminism: On having the ability to choose. Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026