J.J. van der Bij

4.0k total citations
66 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

J.J. van der Bij is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, J.J. van der Bij has authored 66 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 59 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 20 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 5 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in J.J. van der Bij's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (52 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (32 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (31 papers). J.J. van der Bij is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (52 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (32 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (31 papers). J.J. van der Bij collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. J.J. van der Bij's co-authors include E. W. N. Glover, R. Keith Ellis, I. Hinchliffe, M. Soldate, H. van Dam, Y. Jack Ng, Ph. Jetzer, F. Hoogeveen, Eugen Radu and T. Matsuura and has published in prestigious journals such as Nuclear Physics B, Physics Letters B and Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

In The Last Decade

J.J. van der Bij

64 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J.J. van der Bij Germany 27 2.1k 757 169 82 50 66 2.2k
M. S. Berger United States 24 2.0k 0.9× 740 1.0× 256 1.5× 159 1.9× 60 1.2× 60 2.1k
Bohdan Grza̧dkowski Poland 28 3.2k 1.5× 890 1.2× 82 0.5× 78 1.0× 74 1.5× 108 3.2k
JoAnne L. Hewett United States 30 3.0k 1.4× 1.1k 1.5× 174 1.0× 77 0.9× 56 1.1× 84 3.0k
Hong-Jian He China 32 2.7k 1.3× 864 1.1× 71 0.4× 59 0.7× 60 1.2× 87 2.8k
I. Hinchliffe United States 25 2.4k 1.1× 625 0.8× 176 1.0× 71 0.9× 45 0.9× 46 2.4k
John Ellis Switzerland 18 1.8k 0.9× 648 0.9× 109 0.6× 125 1.5× 37 0.7× 27 1.9k
José Wudka United States 28 2.3k 1.1× 682 0.9× 117 0.7× 123 1.5× 57 1.1× 113 2.4k
Christopher D. Carone United States 29 2.1k 1.0× 737 1.0× 267 1.6× 149 1.8× 26 0.5× 94 2.2k
John Ellis Switzerland 24 2.7k 1.3× 1.4k 1.9× 324 1.9× 118 1.4× 46 0.9× 37 2.8k
Bogdan A. Dobrescu United States 34 3.7k 1.8× 1.4k 1.9× 165 1.0× 287 3.5× 71 1.4× 70 3.9k

Countries citing papers authored by J.J. van der Bij

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.J. van der Bij's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.J. van der Bij with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.J. van der Bij more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.J. van der Bij

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.J. van der Bij. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.J. van der Bij. The network helps show where J.J. van der Bij may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.J. van der Bij

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.J. van der Bij. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.J. van der Bij based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J.J. van der Bij. J.J. van der Bij is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bij, J.J. van der. (2010). Gravitational anomaly and fundamental forces. General Relativity and Gravitation. 43(9). 2499–2507. 4 indexed citations
2.
Bij, J.J. van der. (2007). Cosmotopological relation for a unified field theory. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 76(12). 9 indexed citations
3.
Bij, J.J. van der, et al.. (2006). A higher-dimensional explanation of the excess of Higgs-like events at CERN LEP. Physics Letters B. 638(2-3). 234–238. 12 indexed citations
4.
Boughezal, Radja, J.B. Tausk, & J.J. van der Bij. (2005). Three-loop electroweak corrections to the W-boson mass and sin2θefflept in the large Higgs mass limit. Nuclear Physics B. 725(1-2). 3–14. 14 indexed citations
5.
Buszello, C. P., Peter Marquard, & J.J. van der Bij. (2004). On the determination of the structure of the scalar Higgs boson's couplings to vectorbosons. CERN Bulletin. 1 indexed citations
6.
Bonciani, Roberto, Andrea Ferroglia, Pierpaolo Mastrolia, E. Remiddi, & J.J. van der Bij. (2004). Two-loop NF=1 QED Bhabha scattering differential cross section. Nuclear Physics B. 701(1-2). 121–179. 33 indexed citations
7.
Bonciani, Roberto, Andrea Ferroglia, Pierpaolo Mastrolia, E. Remiddi, & J.J. van der Bij. (2004). Planar box diagram for the (N=1) 2-loop QED virtual corrections to Bhabha scattering. Nuclear Physics B. 681(1-2). 261–291. 39 indexed citations
8.
Bij, J.J. van der, K.G. Chetyrkin, M. Faisst, G. Jikia, & T. Seidensticker. (2001). Three-loop leading top mass contributions to the ρ parameter. Physics Letters B. 498(3-4). 156–162. 52 indexed citations
9.
Ghinculov, A., T. Binoth, & J.J. van der Bij. (1998). Nonperturbative Higgs propagator: NLO correction in the1/Nexpansion. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 57(3). 1487–1494. 12 indexed citations
10.
Matsuura, T., et al.. (1994). Leptonic signals from off-shellZ boson pairs at hadron colliders. The European Physical Journal C. 64(2). 219–225. 37 indexed citations
11.
Bij, J.J. van der. (1993). Can gravity make the Higgs particle decouple. Acta Physica Polonica B. 25(5). 827–832. 18 indexed citations
12.
Bij, J.J. van der & Geert Jan van Oldenborgh. (1991). QCD radiative corrections to charged current heavy quark production. The European Physical Journal C. 51(3). 477–483. 20 indexed citations
13.
Glover, E. W. N. & J.J. van der Bij. (1989). Z-boson pair production via gluon fusion. Nuclear Physics B. 321(3). 561–590. 128 indexed citations
14.
Baur, U., E. W. N. Glover, & J.J. van der Bij. (1989). Hadronic production of electroweak vector boson pairs at large transverse momentum. Nuclear Physics B. 318(1). 106–136. 31 indexed citations
15.
Bernreuther, W., J.J. van der Bij, M. J. Duncan, et al.. (1989). RARE $Z$ DECAYS. 1–57. 5 indexed citations
16.
Bij, J.J. van der & E. W. N. Glover. (1988). Photon Z-boson pair production via gluon fusion. Physics Letters B. 206(4). 701–704. 35 indexed citations
17.
Ellis, R. Keith, I. Hinchliffe, M. Soldate, & J.J. van der Bij. (1988). Higgs decay to τ+τ−A possible signature of intermediate mass Higgs bosons at high energy hadron colliders. Nuclear Physics B. 297(2). 221–243. 245 indexed citations
18.
Itoyama, H., et al.. (1987). N = 2 no-scale supergravity. Nuclear Physics B. 279(3-4). 380–400. 8 indexed citations
19.
Bij, J.J. van der, Robert D. Pisarski, & Sumathi Rao. (1986). Topological mass term for gravity induced by matter. Physics Letters B. 179(1-2). 87–91. 22 indexed citations
20.
Bij, J.J. van der. (1986). Does low-energy physics depend on the potential of a heavy Higgs particle?. Nuclear Physics B. 267(3-4). 557–565. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026