I. Hinchliffe

22.9k total citations
46 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

I. Hinchliffe is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, I. Hinchliffe has authored 46 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 45 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 10 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 3 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in I. Hinchliffe's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (43 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (19 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (17 papers). I. Hinchliffe is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (43 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (19 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (17 papers). I. Hinchliffe collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Slovenia. I. Hinchliffe's co-authors include F. Paige, M.A. Furman, Lawrence J. Hall, Michael S. Chanowitz, R. Keith Ellis, Chris Quigg, Mark Claudson, J.J. van der Bij, M. Soldate and E. Eichten and has published in prestigious journals such as Physics Today, Nuclear Physics B and Physics Letters B.

In The Last Decade

I. Hinchliffe

45 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
I. Hinchliffe United States 25 2.4k 625 176 71 45 46 2.4k
J.J. van der Bij Germany 27 2.1k 0.9× 757 1.2× 169 1.0× 82 1.2× 50 1.1× 66 2.2k
C.A. Savoy France 22 2.8k 1.2× 1.0k 1.7× 171 1.0× 67 0.9× 30 0.7× 67 2.9k
R. Rückl Germany 32 3.4k 1.4× 227 0.4× 153 0.9× 71 1.0× 51 1.1× 80 3.4k
J. Ellis Switzerland 9 1.7k 0.7× 478 0.8× 71 0.4× 65 0.9× 39 0.9× 14 1.8k
Christopher D. Carone United States 29 2.1k 0.9× 737 1.2× 267 1.5× 149 2.1× 26 0.6× 94 2.2k
José Santiago Spain 29 2.2k 0.9× 1.0k 1.6× 107 0.6× 64 0.9× 36 0.8× 67 2.2k
José Wudka United States 28 2.3k 1.0× 682 1.1× 117 0.7× 123 1.7× 57 1.3× 113 2.4k
Tobias Hurth Switzerland 30 2.8k 1.2× 408 0.7× 76 0.4× 80 1.1× 101 2.2× 87 2.8k
Lorenzo Magnea Italy 22 1.8k 0.7× 218 0.3× 119 0.7× 57 0.8× 36 0.8× 57 1.8k
Palash B. Pal United States 26 2.2k 0.9× 583 0.9× 96 0.5× 193 2.7× 21 0.5× 109 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by I. Hinchliffe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I. Hinchliffe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. Hinchliffe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. Hinchliffe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I. Hinchliffe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. Hinchliffe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. Hinchliffe. The network helps show where I. Hinchliffe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of I. Hinchliffe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of I. Hinchliffe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of I. Hinchliffe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with I. Hinchliffe. I. Hinchliffe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hinchliffe, I. & Peter Richardson. (2001). Supersymmetric models and collider signatures. Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics. 27(12). 2485–2496. 1 indexed citations
2.
Hinchliffe, I. & F. Paige. (2001). High mass supersymmetry with high-energy hadron colliders. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 144–152. 1 indexed citations
3.
Hinchliffe, I. & N. Kersting. (2000). ConstrainingCPviolating phases of the minimal supersymmetric standard model. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 63(1). 4 indexed citations
4.
Hinchliffe, I. & Aneesh V. Manohar. (2000). The QCD Coupling Constant. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science. 50(1). 643–678. 10 indexed citations
5.
Bachacou, H., I. Hinchliffe, & F. Paige. (2000). Measurements of masses in supergravity models at CERN LHC. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 62(1). 134 indexed citations
6.
Hinchliffe, I.. (1997). Precision physics at LHC. AIP conference proceedings. 129–137. 3 indexed citations
7.
Hinchliffe, I., F. Paige, M. Shapiro, J. Söderqvist, & W.-M. Yao. (1997). Precision SUSY measurements at CERN LHC. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 55(9). 5520–5540. 253 indexed citations
8.
Hinchliffe, I., et al.. (1996). Nonleptonic two-body decays ofDmesons in broken SU(3). Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 54(1). 914–928. 32 indexed citations
9.
Eichten, E., I. Hinchliffe, & Chris Quigg. (1993). Flavor asymmetry of the nucleon sea: Consequences for dilepton production. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 47(3). R747–R750. 13 indexed citations
10.
Hinchliffe, I.. (1989). HEAVY LEPTON SIGNALS AT THE SSC. International Journal of Modern Physics A. 4(15). 3867–3876. 9 indexed citations
11.
Ellis, R. Keith, I. Hinchliffe, M. Soldate, & J.J. van der Bij. (1988). Higgs decay to τ+τ−A possible signature of intermediate mass Higgs bosons at high energy hadron colliders. Nuclear Physics B. 297(2). 221–243. 245 indexed citations
12.
Hinchliffe, I. & S. F. Novaes. (1988). Transverse-momentum distribution of Higgs bosons at the Superconducting Super Collider. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 38(11). 3475–3480. 43 indexed citations
13.
Foley, K. J., A. I. Sanda, G. Herten, et al.. (1987). BOTTOM AND TOP PHYSICS. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 14(3). 701–32. 1 indexed citations
14.
Binétruy, Pierre, S. Dawson, I. Hinchliffe, & Mary K. Gaillard. (1987). The effective potential and supersymmetry breaking in superstring models. Physics Letters B. 192(3-4). 377–384. 25 indexed citations
15.
Binétruy, Pierre, S. Dawson, I. Hinchliffe, & Marc Sher. (1986). Phenomenologically viable models from superstrings?. Nuclear Physics B. 273(3-4). 501–536. 59 indexed citations
16.
Binétruy, Pierre, S. Dawson, & I. Hinchliffe. (1986). Supersymmetry breaking in the observable sector of superstring models. Physics Letters B. 179(3). 262–268. 20 indexed citations
17.
Hinchliffe, I., et al.. (1981). Higher order QCD corrections to double moment ratios in deep inelastic scattering. Nuclear Physics B. 183(3). 397–416. 1 indexed citations
18.
Ellis, R. Keith, M.A. Furman, Howard E. Haber, & I. Hinchliffe. (1980). Large corrections to high-pT hadron-hadron scattering in QCD. Nuclear Physics B. 173(3). 397–421. 106 indexed citations
19.
Chanowitz, Michael S., M.A. Furman, & I. Hinchliffe. (1979). Weak interactions of ultra heavy fermions (II). Nuclear Physics B. 153. 402–430. 266 indexed citations
20.
Hinchliffe, I. & C. Smith. (1977). Possible pattern of scaling violations in the production of W'S, Z'S and μ-pairs. Physics Letters B. 66(3). 281–285. 79 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026