Jin Qi

646 citations
24 papers · 563 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

    • Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 5
    • Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies 4
    • Ginseng Biological Effects and Applications 3
    • Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis 11
    • Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies 4

Jin Qi

24 papers receiving 545 citations

Peers

Jin Qi
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 223
  • Pharmacology 93
  • Analytical Chemistry 88
  • Biochemistry 45
  • Neurology 32
Replace Hui‐Peng Song with:
Hui‐Peng Song China
Han‐Qing Pang China
Cheng Qu China
Huizi Ouyang China
Xiaodong Cong China
Zhanpeng Shang China
Zhenzhong Yang China
Kelvin Chan Hong Kong
Feng‐Chang Lou China
Jin Qi relative to Hui‐Peng Song China Hui‐Peng Song's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Hui‐Peng Song · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jin Qi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jin Qi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jin Qi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jin Qi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jin Qi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jin Qi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jin Qi. The network helps show where Jin Qi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jin Qi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jin Qi Line = papers co-authored together Jin Qi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009127
2 200876
3 200975
4 200861
5 201643
6 201629
7 200924
8 201722
9 201614
10 201713
11 201510
12 200810
13 201510
14 20179
15 20209
16 20108
17 20167
18 20244
19 20253
20
[Survey of 3-monochloropropane-1,2-diol in soy sauce and similar products].
20013

About Jin Qi

Jin Qi is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Complementary and alternative medicine, Plant Science, Pharmacology and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 24 papers that have together received 563 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (11 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (5 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (4 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies (4 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (3 papers), Chromatography in Natural Products (3 papers), Ginseng Biological Effects and Applications (3 papers) and Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (223 citations), Pharmacology (93 citations), Analytical Chemistry (88 citations), Biochemistry (45 citations) and Neurology (32 citations). Jin Qi has collaborated with scholars based in China, Macao and United States. Frequent co-authors include Boyang Yu, Yanxu Chang, Danni Zhu, Ding Xiao-ping, Linlin Chen, Xialin Chen, Yujie Guo, Li‐Yuan Kang, Boli Zhang and Jun Cao. Their work appears in journals such as Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, Journal of Separation Science and Journal of Chromatography A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact