Jill Annison

500 citations
17 papers · 304 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Jill Annison

15 papers receiving 277 citations

Peers

Jill Annison
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Public Administration 57
  • General Health Professions 175
  • Clinical Psychology 144
  • Sociology and Political Science 245
  • Political Science and International Relations 29
Replace Ian Paylor with:
Ian Paylor United Kingdom
Veronika Paulsen Norway
Sue Rex United Kingdom
Shirley Gatenio Gabel United States
Robin Sen United Kingdom
Steven Roche Australia
George Mair United Kingdom
Sarah Cemlyn United Kingdom
Carol Hedderman United Kingdom
Tim Goddard United States
Jill Annison relative to Ian Paylor United Kingdom Ian Paylor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Ian Paylor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jill Annison

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jill Annison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jill Annison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jill Annison more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jill Annison

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jill Annison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jill Annison. The network helps show where Jill Annison may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Jill Annison, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jill Annison Line = papers co-authored together Jill Annison links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2004121
2 200874
3 201419
4 201918
5 200716
6 200611
7 20189
8 20138
9 20136
10 20155
11 20185
12 20025
13
The resettlement of women offenders: learning the lessons: a research project focusing on the experience of the female offender.
20163
14 20092
15 20182
16 20140
17 20210

About Jill Annison

Jill Annison is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and Public Administration, having authored 17 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (12 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (7 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (4 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (3 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (2 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (1 paper) and Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (57 citations), General Health Professions (175 citations), Clinical Psychology (144 citations), Sociology and Political Science (245 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (29 citations). Jill Annison has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Samantha Walker, Richard Byng, Cath Quinn, Rod Sheaff, Ian Porter, John Campbell, Christabel Owens, Paul Gray, Gary Wallace and Siobhan Creanor. Their work appears in journals such as Probation Journal, European Journal of Probation, Criminology & Criminal Justice, BMC Family Practice and Innovations in Education and Teaching International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact