Jiancai Pi
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Strategy and Management
- Co-authors
- Yu ZhouYang LiJulan DuJing Long Bu
- Topics
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (17 papers)Global trade and economics (14 papers)Economic theories and models (14 papers)
- Cited by
- General Economics, Econometrics and FinanceEconomics and EconometricsSociology and Political Science
- Partner nations
- ChinaJapanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jiancai Pi
56 papers receiving 456 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Economics and Econometrics 381
- Sociology and Political Science 125
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 116
- Political Science and International Relations 44
- Strategy and Management 34
Countries citing papers authored by Jiancai Pi
This map shows the geographic impact of Jiancai Pi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jiancai Pi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jiancai Pi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jiancai Pi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jiancai Pi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jiancai Pi. The network helps show where Jiancai Pi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jiancai Pi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jiancai Pi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jiancai Pi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jiancai Pi. Jiancai Pi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | Privatization and environmental pollution in a mixed duopoly | 5 |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Research on the Central and Local Governments' Boundary in China's Economic Development——From the Perspective of Incomplete Contract Theory | 1 |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Jiancai Pi
Jiancai Pi is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics and Safety Research, having authored 64 papers that have together received 467 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (17 papers), Global trade and economics (14 papers) and Economic theories and models (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (116 citations), Economics and Econometrics (381 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (125 citations). Jiancai Pi has collaborated with scholars based in China, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yu Zhou, Yang Li, Julan Du and Jing Long Bu. Their work appears in journals such as Economics Letters, Economic Modelling and China Economic Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.