Jia Wei Li
About
In The Last Decade
Jia Wei Li
10 papers receiving 319 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Surgery 191
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 55
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 40
- Materials Chemistry 38
- Water Science and Technology 33
Countries citing papers authored by Jia Wei Li
This map shows the geographic impact of Jia Wei Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jia Wei Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jia Wei Li more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jia Wei Li
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jia Wei Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jia Wei Li. The network helps show where Jia Wei Li may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jia Wei Li
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jia Wei Li. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jia Wei Li based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jia Wei Li. Jia Wei Li is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53 | |
| 2 | 31 | |
| 3 | 71 | |
| 4 | 33 | |
| 5 | 40 | |
| 6 | 26 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 36 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 7 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.