J.F. Stoltz
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Surgery top 10%
- Surfaces, Coatings and Films top 2%
- Physiology top 10%
- Co-authors
- J.‐C. VoegelCatherine PicartPatrick MenuE. PayanM. DonnerBernard SengerS. MüllerDominique Dumas
- Topics
- Blood properties and coagulation (54 papers)Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (36 papers)Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceArgentinaSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
J.F. Stoltz
134 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 484
- Biomedical Engineering 381
- Surgery 326
- Surfaces, Coatings and Films 312
- Physiology 282
Countries citing papers authored by J.F. Stoltz
This map shows the geographic impact of J.F. Stoltz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.F. Stoltz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.F. Stoltz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J.F. Stoltz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.F. Stoltz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.F. Stoltz. The network helps show where J.F. Stoltz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.F. Stoltz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.F. Stoltz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.F. Stoltz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J.F. Stoltz. J.F. Stoltz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | 33 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | Three-dimensional numerical simulation of blood flow through a modeled aneurysm | 1 |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 59 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 33 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | [Hemorheology in clinical practice. Introduction to the notion of hemorheologic profile]. | 9 |
| 17 | 43 | |
| 18 | Hémorhéologie, hémodynamique et microcirculation. Première partie. | 1 |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About J.F. Stoltz
J.F. Stoltz is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Physiology and Biophysics, having authored 144 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood properties and coagulation (54 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (36 papers) and Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surfaces, Coatings and Films (312 citations), Biomaterials (281 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (484 citations). J.F. Stoltz has collaborated with scholars based in France, Argentina and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include J.‐C. Voegel, Catherine Picart, Patrick Menu, E. Payan, M. Donner, Bernard Senger, S. Müller, Dominique Dumas, Ph. Lavalle and Pierre Schaaf. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Biomaterials and Langmuir.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.