Jessica Knapp

674 total citations
10 papers, 263 citations indexed

About

Jessica Knapp is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Jessica Knapp has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 263 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 8 papers in Insect Science and 5 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Jessica Knapp's work include Plant and animal studies (10 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (6 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (4 papers). Jessica Knapp is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (10 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (6 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (4 papers). Jessica Knapp collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Ireland. Jessica Knapp's co-authors include Juliet L. Osborne, Rosalind F. Shaw, O. Jonsson, Maj Rundlöf, Joachim R. de Miranda, Lewis J. Bartlett, Matthias A. Becher, Charlie Nicholson, Benjamin B. Phillips and Volker Grimm and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Applied Ecology and Ecological Modelling.

In The Last Decade

Jessica Knapp

10 papers receiving 259 citations

Peers

Jessica Knapp

EEBS

IS

GENET

PS

SP

Moshe Gish Israel

Tobias J. Smith Australia

Phillip O. Y. Nkunika Zambia

Lise Ropars France

Ulrika Samnegård Sweden

Julia M. Schmack Germany

Rafael Cabral Borges Brazil

Mark Otieno Kenya

Guy Rodet France

Willian Moura de Aguiar Brazil

Moshe Gish Israel

Jessica Knapp

122 ×0.6

EEBS

180 ×1.1

IS

59 ×0.7

GENET

106 ×1.2

PS

26 ×1.0

SP

Citations per year, relative to Jessica Knapp Jessica Knapp (= 1×) peers Moshe Gish

Countries citing papers authored by Jessica Knapp

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jessica Knapp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jessica Knapp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jessica Knapp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jessica Knapp

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jessica Knapp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jessica Knapp. The network helps show where Jessica Knapp may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jessica Knapp

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jessica Knapp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jessica Knapp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jessica Knapp. Jessica Knapp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Nicholson, Charlie, Eric V. Lonsdorf, Georg K.S. Andersson, et al.. (2024). Landscapes of risk: A comparative analysis of landscape metrics for the ecotoxicological assessment of pesticide risk to bees. Journal of Applied Ecology. 61(5). 975–986. 4 indexed citations

2.

Knapp, Jessica, Charlie Nicholson, O. Jonsson, Joachim R. de Miranda, & Maj Rundlöf. (2023). Ecological traits interact with landscape context to determine bees’ pesticide risk. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 7(4). 547–556. 54 indexed citations

3.

Knapp, Jessica, Adam J. Bates, O. Jonsson, et al.. (2022). Pollinators, pests and yield—Multiple trade‐offs from insecticide use in a mass‐flowering crop. Journal of Applied Ecology. 59(9). 2419–2429. 14 indexed citations

4.

Knapp, Jessica, et al.. (2020). Socio‐psychological factors, beyond knowledge, predict people’s engagement in pollinator conservation. People and Nature. 3(1). 204–220. 51 indexed citations

5.

Knapp, Jessica & Juliet L. Osborne. (2019). Cucurbits as a model system for crop pollination management. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 25. 19 indexed citations

6.

Knapp, Jessica, Rosalind F. Shaw, & Juliet L. Osborne. (2018). Pollinator visitation to mass-flowering courgette and co-flowering wild flowers: Implications for pollination and bee conservation on farms. Basic and Applied Ecology. 34. 85–94. 13 indexed citations

7.

Knapp, Jessica, et al.. (2018). Bombus terrestris in a mass‐flowering pollinator‐dependent crop: A mutualistic relationship?. Ecology and Evolution. 9(1). 609–618. 13 indexed citations

8.

Knapp, Jessica & Juliet L. Osborne. (2017). Courgette Production: Pollination Demand, Supply, and Value. Journal of Economic Entomology. 110(5). 1973–1979. 11 indexed citations

9.

Becher, Matthias A., et al.. (2016). BEESCOUT: A model of bee scouting behaviour and a software tool for characterizing nectar/pollen landscapes for BEEHAVE. Ecological Modelling. 340. 126–133. 52 indexed citations

10.

Knapp, Jessica, Lewis J. Bartlett, & Juliet L. Osborne. (2016). Re‐evaluating strategies for pollinator‐dependent crops: How useful is parthenocarpy?. Journal of Applied Ecology. 54(4). 1171–1179. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact