Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Does Mother Nature Corrupt? Natural Resources, Corruption, and Economic Growth
Citations per year, relative to Jens Weidmann Jens Weidmann (= 1×)
peers
Carlos Antônio Moreira Leite
Countries citing papers authored by Jens Weidmann
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jens Weidmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens Weidmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens Weidmann more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens Weidmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens Weidmann. The network helps show where Jens Weidmann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jens Weidmann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jens Weidmann.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jens Weidmann based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jens Weidmann. Jens Weidmann is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Weidmann, Jens. (2019). Jens Weidmann: What the future holds - benefits and limitations of forward guidance.1 indexed citations
2.
Weidmann, Jens. (2018). Jens Weidmann: Central bank communication as an instrument of monetary policy.2 indexed citations
3.
Weidmann, Jens. (2017). Jens Weidmann: Monetary union - ever a work in progress? The euro area torn between the Maastricht framework and fiscal union.
4.
Weidmann, Jens. (2016). Nicht gegen die Gesetze der Ökonomie – Hans-Werner Sinn als öffentlicher Intellektueller. Econstor (Econstor). 69(9). 13–17.1 indexed citations
5.
Weidmann, Jens. (2016). Jens Weidmann: Hans Möller medal acceptance speech.
6.
Weidmann, Jens. (2015). Zur Rolle der Finanzstabilität für die Geldpolitik. Econstor (Econstor). 68(7). 34–42.
7.
Weidmann, Jens. (2014). Jens Weidmann: Banking union and regulatory reforms - mission accomplished?.1 indexed citations
Issing, Otmar, et al.. (2008). New Financial Order : Recommendations by the Issing Committee; Preparing G-20 - Washington, November 15, 2008.1 indexed citations
Weidmann, Jens. (2002). Hat sich die Prognosetreffsicherheit des Sachverständigenrates systematisch verändert. Wirtschaftsdienst. 82(12). 741–747.2 indexed citations
12.
Gangl, Markus, et al.. (2002). Wie sind die Vorschläge der Hartz-Kommission zu beurteilen?. Wirtschaftsdienst. 82(8). 451–463.1 indexed citations
13.
Leite, Carlos Antônio Moreira & Jens Weidmann. (2001). Does Mother Nature Corrupt? Natural Resources, Corruption, and Economic Growth. SSRN Electronic Journal.571 indexed citations breakdown →
Leite, Carlos Antônio Moreira & Jens Weidmann. (1999). Does mother nature corrupt.139 indexed citations
18.
Weidmann, Jens. (1996). New Hope for the Fisher Effect? A Re-Examination Using Threshold Cointegration. SSRN Electronic Journal.15 indexed citations
19.
Henry, Jérôme & Jens Weidmann. (1995). Asymmetry in the EMS Revisited: Evidence from the Causality Analysis of Daily Eurorates. Annals of Economics and Statistics. 125–160.12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.