Reda Cherif

1.5k citations
69 papers · 795 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Reda Cherif

61 papers receiving 658 citations

Peers

Reda Cherif
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 336
  • Development 59
  • Economics and Econometrics 437
  • General Energy 15
  • Business and International Management 23
Replace Fuad Hasanov with:
Fuad Hasanov United States
Gabriel Porcile Brazil
Kishor Sharma Australia
Aziz N. Berdiev United States
Otaviano Canuto Brazil
K. Peren Arın United Arab Emirates
Luis‐Felipe Zanna United States
Bernadette Andréosso-O’Callaghan Ireland
Marco Fugazza United States
Paul J. J. Welfens Germany
Reda Cherif relative to Fuad Hasanov United States Fuad Hasanov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Fuad Hasanov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Reda Cherif

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Reda Cherif's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reda Cherif with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reda Cherif more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Reda Cherif

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Reda Cherif. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Reda Cherif. The network helps show where Reda Cherif may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Reda Cherif, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Reda Cherif Line = papers co-authored together Reda Cherif links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201973
2 200968
3 201950
4 200947
5 201436
6 201935
7 201233
8 201733
9 201829
10 201328
11 201423
12 201222
13 202019
14 201917
15 202117
16 201217
17 201716
18 201216
19
Tourism Specialization and Economic Development: Evidence from the UNESCO World Heritage List
200914
20 201814

About Reda Cherif

Reda Cherif is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Strategy and Management, Political Science and International Relations and Information Systems, having authored 69 papers that have together received 795 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Growth and Productivity (20 papers), Global trade and economics (14 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (14 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (10 papers), Natural Resources and Economic Development (9 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (6 papers), International Business and FDI (5 papers) and Economic and Technological Innovation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (336 citations), Development (59 citations), Economics and Econometrics (437 citations), General Energy (15 citations) and Business and International Management (23 citations). Reda Cherif has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Fuad Hasanov, Rabah Arezki, Lichen Wang, Philippe Aghion, Jesús González‐García, Tim Callen, Xiangming Fang, Min Zhu, Karim Barhoumi and Nooman Rebei. Their work appears in journals such as World Development, Global Policy, Journal of Industry Competition and Trade, Empirical Economics and Economic Modelling.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact