Jens Ebert

538 total citations
9 papers, 62 citations indexed

About

Jens Ebert is a scholar working on Radiation, Computational Mechanics and Spectroscopy. According to data from OpenAlex, Jens Ebert has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 62 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Radiation, 3 papers in Computational Mechanics and 3 papers in Spectroscopy. Recurrent topics in Jens Ebert's work include Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (2 papers) and Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (2 papers). Jens Ebert is often cited by papers focused on Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (2 papers) and Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (2 papers). Jens Ebert collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Russia and Romania. Jens Ebert's co-authors include T. Dickel, W. R. Plaß, H. Geißel, C. Scheidenberger, E. Haettner, W. Lippert, Mikhail Yavor, Martin Petrick, C. Jesch and C. Hornung and has published in prestigious journals such as Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Information Systems Frontiers.

In The Last Decade

Jens Ebert

9 papers receiving 60 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jens Ebert Germany	6	32	23	20	16	9	9	62
C. Hornung Germany	6	17 0.5×	25 1.1×	39 1.9×	24 1.5×	5 0.6×	12	62
Florian Greiner Germany	5	26 0.8×	36 1.6×	37 1.9×	21 1.3×	5 0.6×	12	68
Z. Di Germany	2	20 0.6×	31 1.3×	29 1.4×	6 0.4×	4 0.4×	2	47
K. Siegl United States	4	24 0.8×	32 1.4×	46 2.3×	25 1.6×	3 0.3×	9	69
J. Bergmann Germany	4	10 0.3×	12 0.5×	18 0.9×	15 0.9×	4 0.4×	7	35
J. Lory France	3	18 0.6×	20 0.9×	30 1.5×	8 0.5×	3 0.3×	5	49
Ann-Kathrin Rink Germany	4	12 0.4×	19 0.8×	20 1.0×	14 0.9×	3 0.3×	5	37
K. S. Kozier Canada	5	15 0.5×	15 0.7×	32 1.6×	30 1.9×	4 0.4×	15	58
P. Ruotsalainen Finland	4	14 0.4×	33 1.4×	52 2.6×	10 0.6×		8	56
J. Sarén Finland	6	10 0.3×	34 1.5×	71 3.5×	31 1.9×		17	81

Countries citing papers authored by Jens Ebert

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jens Ebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens Ebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens Ebert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jens Ebert

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens Ebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens Ebert. The network helps show where Jens Ebert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jens Ebert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jens Ebert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jens Ebert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jens Ebert. Jens Ebert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Riar, Marc, et al.. (2025). Can Gamification Foster Trust-Building in Human-Robot Collaboration? An Experiment in Virtual Reality. Information Systems Frontiers. 27(5). 2001–2026. 1 indexed citations

2.

Dickel, T., S. Ayet, J. Bergmann, et al.. (2020). Separation of atomic and molecular ions by ion mobility with an RF carpet. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 459. 116450–116450. 6 indexed citations

3.

Ebert, Jens, et al.. (2019). Compiling VR/AR Trainings from Business Process Models. 181–186. 1 indexed citations

4.

Greiner, Florian, T. Dickel, S. Ayet, et al.. (2019). Removal of molecular contamination in low-energy RIBs by the isolation-dissociation-isolation method. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 463. 324–326. 5 indexed citations

5.

Purushothaman, S., S. Ayet, J. Bergmann, et al.. (2017). Hyper-EMG: A new probability distribution function composed of Exponentially Modified Gaussian distributions to analyze asymmetric peak shapes in high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 421. 245–254. 15 indexed citations

6.

Ebert, Jens, et al.. (2016). Mass measurements of 238U-projectile fragments for the first time with a Multiple-Reflection Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometer. GSI Repository (German Federal Government). 1 indexed citations

7.

Plaß, W. R., T. Dickel, S. Ayet, et al.. (2015). High-performance multiple-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometers for research with exotic nuclei and for analytical mass spectrometry. Physica Scripta. T166. 14069–14069. 9 indexed citations

8.

Dickel, T., W. R. Plaß, Johannes Lang, et al.. (2013). Multiple-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometry for in situ applications. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 317. 779–784. 18 indexed citations

9.

Ebert, Jens, et al.. (2011). Schreiben im Krieg, Schreiben vom Krieg : Feldpost im Zeitalter der Weltkriege. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact