Jens Christensen
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Radiation top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Surgery
- Oncology
- Co-authors
- Marie OvergaardJens OvergaardInger HøjrisHoward D. ThamesSøren M. BentzenRichard E. KorfHåkan AlfredsonGustav Andersson
- Topics
- AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (5 papers)Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (4 papers)Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers)
- Journals
- The LancetRadiotherapy and OncologyTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
- Partner nations
- DenmarkUnited StatesSweden
In The Last Decade
Jens Christensen
14 papers receiving 485 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Cancer Research 271
- Radiation 137
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 130
- Surgery 120
- Oncology 118
Countries citing papers authored by Jens Christensen
This map shows the geographic impact of Jens Christensen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens Christensen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens Christensen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jens Christensen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens Christensen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens Christensen. The network helps show where Jens Christensen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jens Christensen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jens Christensen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jens Christensen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jens Christensen. Jens Christensen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 37 | |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 254 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | Automatic Abstraction in Planning | 9 |
| 11 | A formal model for classical planning | 3 |
| 12 | A hierarchical planner that generates its own hierarchies | 18 |
| 13 | 66 | |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | 0 |
About Jens Christensen
Jens Christensen is a scholar working on Radiation, Software and Cancer Research, having authored 15 papers that have together received 517 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (5 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (4 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (271 citations), Radiation (137 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (130 citations). Jens Christensen has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Marie Overgaard, Jens Overgaard, Inger Højris, Howard D. Thames, Søren M. Bentzen, Richard E. Korf, Håkan Alfredson, Gustav Andersson, Kari Tanderup and Jacob Christian Lindegaard. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Radiotherapy and Oncology and Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.