Jens Amendt

5.6k total citations · 3 hit papers
112 papers, 3.9k citations indexed

About

Jens Amendt is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Jens Amendt has authored 112 papers receiving a total of 3.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 108 papers in Insect Science, 32 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 30 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Jens Amendt's work include Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (105 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (40 papers) and Insect behavior and control techniques (32 papers). Jens Amendt is often cited by papers focused on Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (105 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (40 papers) and Insect behavior and control techniques (32 papers). Jens Amendt collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Thailand and United Kingdom. Jens Amendt's co-authors include Richard Zehner, Carlo Pietro Campobasso, M. J. R. Hall, Roman Krettek, Marcel A. Verhoff, Martin Grassberger, M. Lee Goff, Hélène N. LeBlanc, Christian Reiter and Emmanuel Gaudry and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, PLoS ONE and The Science of The Total Environment.

In The Last Decade

Jens Amendt

109 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Hit Papers

Best practice in forensic entomology—standards and guidel... 2006 2026 2012 2019 2006 2010 2011 200 400 600

Peers

Jens Amendt
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Insect Science 3.5k
  • Genetics 1.2k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 992
  • Ecology 802
  • Small Animals 427
Replace Thomas Pape with:
Thomas Pape Denmark
James F. Wallman Australia
Jason H. Byrd United States
Bryan Turner United Kingdom
R. H. L. Disney United Kingdom
Wesley Augusto Conde Godoy Brazil
Jennifer L. Pechal United States
Kenneth G. V. Smith United Kingdom
Norma H. Sardella Argentina
Ricardo Guerrero Venezuela
Thomas Pape Denmark View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Jens Amendt
Jens Amendt · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Jens Amendt
Jens Amendt · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Jens Amendt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jens Amendt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens Amendt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens Amendt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jens Amendt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens Amendt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens Amendt. The network helps show where Jens Amendt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jens Amendt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jens Amendt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jens Amendt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jens Amendt. Jens Amendt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 2
3 5
4 7
5 4
6 12
7 12
8 18
9 5
10 38
11 9
12 5
13 17
14 35
15 7
16 28
17 44
18 16
19
Forensic entomology: applications and limitations breakdown →
389
20 8

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026