Jenny De Laet
- Ecology top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Co-authors
- J. Denis Summers‐SmithFrank AdriaensenErik MatthysenMarcel E. VisserAndré A. DhondtЕ.В. ИванкинаDavid ThomsonMarkku Orell
- Topics
- Avian ecology and behavior (6 papers)Animal Behavior and Reproduction (3 papers)Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesLandscape and Urban PlanningUrban Ecosystems
- Partner nations
- BelgiumUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Jenny De Laet
11 papers receiving 535 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Ecology 414
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 208
- Ecological Modeling 190
- Global and Planetary Change 120
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 115
Countries citing papers authored by Jenny De Laet
This map shows the geographic impact of Jenny De Laet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jenny De Laet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jenny De Laet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jenny De Laet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jenny De Laet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jenny De Laet. The network helps show where Jenny De Laet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jenny De Laet
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jenny De Laet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jenny De Laet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jenny De Laet. Jenny De Laet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 39 | |
| 2 | 43 | |
| 3 | 39 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | Protocol for censusing urban sparrows | 7 |
| 6 | 112 | |
| 7 | The status of the House Sparrow in large towns: First results from Belgium | 2 |
| 8 | 238 | |
| 9 | Over merels en andere kerels | 1 |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | 29 |
About Jenny De Laet
Jenny De Laet is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Parasitology and Ecology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 572 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Avian ecology and behavior (6 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (3 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (190 citations), Ecology (414 citations) and Developmental Biology (24 citations). Jenny De Laet has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include J. Denis Summers‐Smith, Frank Adriaensen, Erik Matthysen, Marcel E. Visser, André A. Dhondt, Е.В. Иванкина, David Thomson, Markku Orell, J.H. Van Balen and R. H. McCleery. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Landscape and Urban Planning and Urban Ecosystems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.