Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Take Back the Economy
2013374 citationsKatherine Gibson, Jenny Cameron et al.University of Minnesota Press eBooksprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Jenny Cameron's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jenny Cameron with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jenny Cameron more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jenny Cameron. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jenny Cameron. The network helps show where Jenny Cameron may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jenny Cameron
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jenny Cameron.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jenny Cameron based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jenny Cameron. Jenny Cameron is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gibson, Katherine, Jenny Cameron, & Stephen Healy. (2013). Take Back the Economy. University of Minnesota Press eBooks.374 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Cameron, Jenny. (2010). Business as usual or economic innovation?: work, markets and growth in community and social enterprises. [Paper in special issue: Social Enterprise and Social Innovation. Barraket, Jo and Grant, Suzanne (eds).]. 16(2). 93.6 indexed citations
7.
Cameron, Jenny. (2010). Business as usual or economic innovation?: work, markets and growth in community and social enterprises. NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia).6 indexed citations
8.
Cameron, Jenny, et al.. (2010). Growing the community of community gardens: research contributions. NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia).1 indexed citations
9.
Gibson, Katherine, Julie Graham, & Jenny Cameron. (2007). Community Enterprises: Imagining and enacting alternatives to capitalism. ANU Open Research (Australian National University). 26(1). 20–25.28 indexed citations
10.
Cameron, Jenny, et al.. (2006). Planning Public Involvement: A Step-by-Step Guide. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 1(1).1 indexed citations
Cameron, Jenny & Anna Johnson. (2004). Evaluation for development. Australian Planner. 41(1). 49–55.3 indexed citations
16.
Cameron, Jenny. (2003). Collaborating with communities: an asset-based approach to community and economic development. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia).1 indexed citations
Cameron, Jenny, William B. Young, & H. A. Sissons. (1954). METAPHYSIAL DYSOSTOSIS. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume. 36-B(4). 622–629.20 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.