Jennifer Thake
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Health top 10%
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Papers in
-
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 3
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 3
- Co-authors
- Christopher G. DavisCharlene Y. SennJohn M. ZelenskiChristine FrankDiana KoszyckiMonica TaljaardJacques BradwejnJohn R. Weekes
- Journals
- Personality and Individual Differences (1 paper)Journal of Research in Personality (1 paper)The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine (1 paper)Psychology of Women Quarterly (1 paper)Addiction Research & Theory (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jennifer Thake
8 papers receiving 532 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Applied Psychology 94
- Health 64
- Epidemiology 234
- Clinical Psychology 119
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 72
Countries citing papers authored by Jennifer Thake
This map shows the geographic impact of Jennifer Thake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jennifer Thake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jennifer Thake more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jennifer Thake
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jennifer Thake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jennifer Thake. The network helps show where Jennifer Thake may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Jennifer Thake, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 42 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 24 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 27 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 47 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 373 |
About Jennifer Thake
Jennifer Thake is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Gender Studies, Clinical Psychology and Health, having authored 8 papers that have together received 552 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (2 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (1 paper), Gender, Security, and Conflict (1 paper) and Intimate Partner and Family Violence (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (94 citations), Health (64 citations), Epidemiology (234 citations), Clinical Psychology (119 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (72 citations). Jennifer Thake has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Christopher G. Davis, Charlene Y. Senn, John M. Zelenski, Christine Frank, Diana Koszycki, Monica Taljaard, Jacques Bradwejn, John R. Weekes, Sanjay Rao and Steve Kisely. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Journal of Research in Personality, The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, Psychology of Women Quarterly and Addiction Research & Theory.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.