Jen-Chi Lee

839 citations
49 papers · 599 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Jen-Chi Lee

47 papers receiving 588 citations

Peers

Jen-Chi Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 20
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 584
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 147
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 117
  • Condensed Matter Physics 36
  • Geometry and Topology 21
Replace T. Hotta with:
T. Hotta Japan
Koji Harada Japan
Shyamoli Chaudhuri United States
A. Vladikas Italy
Kazunori Takenaga Japan
Georg Bergner Germany
A.V. Smilga Russia
M. Talevi United Kingdom
Mario Flory Poland
A. Ya. Parkhomenko Russia
Jen-Chi Lee relative to T. Hotta Japan T. Hotta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×27×
T. Hotta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jen-Chi Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jen-Chi Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jen-Chi Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jen-Chi Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jen-Chi Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jen-Chi Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jen-Chi Lee. The network helps show where Jen-Chi Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Jen-Chi Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jen-Chi Lee Line = papers co-authored together Jen-Chi Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199044
2 200541
3 199041
4 200439
5 200436
6 199035
7 199530
8 200525
9 200621
10 199721
11 199418
12 200617
13 200917
14 199415
15 200615
16 199815
17 199413
18 200712
19 200711
20 20119

About Jen-Chi Lee

Jen-Chi Lee is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Condensed Matter Physics and Geometry and Topology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 599 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (43 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (30 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (26 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (9 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (6 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (6 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (4 papers) and Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (584 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (147 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (117 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (36 citations) and Geometry and Topology (21 citations). Jen-Chi Lee has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Yi Yang, Burt A. Ovrut, Pei-Ming Ho, Taejin Lee, Song He, I-Hsun Tsai, Yi Yang, C. D. Fu, Chung-I Tan and Chin‐Hung Sun. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Physics B, Physics Letters B, The European Physical Journal C, Journal of High Energy Physics and International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact