Jeffrey L. Santee
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Statistics and Probability top 10%
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers)Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Cognitive NeuroscienceExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyDevelopmental and Educational Psychology
- Journals
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & PerformanceApplied Psychophysiology and BiofeedbackPerception & Psychophysics
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Jeffrey L. Santee
13 papers receiving 479 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Cognitive Neuroscience 432
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 176
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 99
- Social Psychology 79
- Statistics and Probability 34
Countries citing papers authored by Jeffrey L. Santee
This map shows the geographic impact of Jeffrey L. Santee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeffrey L. Santee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeffrey L. Santee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jeffrey L. Santee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeffrey L. Santee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeffrey L. Santee. The network helps show where Jeffrey L. Santee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jeffrey L. Santee
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jeffrey L. Santee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jeffrey L. Santee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jeffrey L. Santee. Jeffrey L. Santee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32 | |
| 2 | 140 | |
| 3 | 85 | |
| 4 | 56 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 43 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 31 | |
| 11 | 45 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 12 |
About Jeffrey L. Santee
Jeffrey L. Santee is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Speech and Hearing, having authored 13 papers that have together received 514 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (432 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (176 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (99 citations). Jeffrey L. Santee has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Howard E. Egeth, Michael McCloskey and Kenneth M. Kleinman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback and Perception & Psychophysics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.