Citations per year, relative to Jeffrey Knockel Jeffrey Knockel (= 1×)
peers
Halil Bişğin
Countries citing papers authored by Jeffrey Knockel
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jeffrey Knockel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeffrey Knockel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeffrey Knockel more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeffrey Knockel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeffrey Knockel. The network helps show where Jeffrey Knockel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jeffrey Knockel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jeffrey Knockel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jeffrey Knockel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jeffrey Knockel. Jeffrey Knockel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Knockel, Jeffrey, et al.. (2021). How Great is the Great Firewall? Measuring China's DNS Censorship.. USENIX Security Symposium. 3381–3398.8 indexed citations
4.
Knockel, Jeffrey, et al.. (2019). An Efficient Method to Determine which Combination of Keywords Triggered Automatic Filtering of a Message. USENIX Security Symposium.2 indexed citations
5.
Parsons, Christopher, et al.. (2019). The Predator in Your Pocket: A Multidisciplinary Assessment of the Stalkerware Application Industry. TSpace (University of Toronto).11 indexed citations
6.
Knockel, Jeffrey, et al.. (2018). An analysis of automatic image filtering on WeChat Moments. USENIX Security Symposium.2 indexed citations
7.
Knockel, Jeffrey. (2018). Measuring Decentralization of Chinese Censorship in Three Industry Segments. UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico).2 indexed citations
8.
Knockel, Jeffrey, et al.. (2017). Measuring Decentralization of Chinese Keyword Censorship via Mobile Games. USENIX Security Symposium.9 indexed citations
9.
Knockel, Jeffrey, et al.. (2017). We (Can’t) Chat: “709 Crackdown” Discussions Blocked on Weibo and WeChat. TSpace.2 indexed citations
10.
Crete‐Nishihata, Masashi, et al.. (2017). Managing the Message: What you can’t say about the 19th National Communist Party Congress on WeChat. TSpace.1 indexed citations
11.
Knockel, Jeffrey, et al.. (2016). Privacy and Security Issues in {BAT} Web Browsers.4 indexed citations
Ursu, Oleg, Jayme Holmes, Jeffrey Knockel, et al.. (2016). DrugCentral: online drug compendium. Nucleic Acids Research. 45(D1). D932–D939.202 indexed citations
14.
Knockel, Jeffrey, et al.. (2016). One App, Two Systems: How WeChat uses one censorship policy in China and another internationally. TSpace (University of Toronto).24 indexed citations
15.
Knockel, Jeffrey, et al.. (2016). A Tough Nut to Crack: A Further Look at Privacy and Security Issues in UC Browser. TSpace.1 indexed citations
Knockel, Jeffrey & Jedidiah R. Crandall. (2012). Protecting free and open communications on the internet against man-in-the-middle attacks on third-party software: We’re foci’d.3 indexed citations
20.
Crandall, Jedidiah R., et al.. (2012). Whiskey, weed, and wukan on the world Wide Web: On measuring censors' resources and motivations.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.