Jeffrey H. Weiss
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Safety Research top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Topics
- Game Theory and Voting Systems (10 papers)Game Theory and Applications (6 papers)Economic theories and models (6 papers)
- Cited by
- Management Science and Operations ResearchGeneral Decision SciencesEconomics and Econometrics
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Jeffrey H. Weiss
20 papers receiving 283 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Economics and Econometrics 202
- Management Science and Operations Research 151
- Sociology and Political Science 66
- Safety Research 38
- Political Science and International Relations 34
Countries citing papers authored by Jeffrey H. Weiss
This map shows the geographic impact of Jeffrey H. Weiss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeffrey H. Weiss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeffrey H. Weiss more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jeffrey H. Weiss
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeffrey H. Weiss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeffrey H. Weiss. The network helps show where Jeffrey H. Weiss may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jeffrey H. Weiss
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jeffrey H. Weiss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jeffrey H. Weiss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jeffrey H. Weiss. Jeffrey H. Weiss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 264 | |
| 17 | The ambivalent value of voluntary provision of public goods in a political economy | 3 |
| 18 | Analysis of urban health problems | 2 |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | A job classification scheme for health manpower. | 1 |
About Jeffrey H. Weiss
Jeffrey H. Weiss is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 341 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Game Theory and Voting Systems (10 papers), Game Theory and Applications (6 papers) and Economic theories and models (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (151 citations), General Decision Sciences (15 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (202 citations). Jeffrey H. Weiss has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Martín Shubik, Kathryn E. Barry and Myron D. Fottler. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Finance, Journal of Economic Theory and Industrial and Labor Relations Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.