Jeffrey Escoffier
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Clinical Psychology
- Surgery
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- A. GauthierM NoirclercN. CanoJ. di CostanzoFred WassermanJohn HowardGilbert HerdtR Camatte
- Topics
- Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (7 papers)LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (5 papers)Sex work and related issues (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Jeffrey Escoffier
20 papers receiving 262 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Sociology and Political Science 135
- Gender Studies 130
- Clinical Psychology 105
- Surgery 85
- Social Psychology 83
Countries citing papers authored by Jeffrey Escoffier
This map shows the geographic impact of Jeffrey Escoffier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeffrey Escoffier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeffrey Escoffier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jeffrey Escoffier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeffrey Escoffier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeffrey Escoffier. The network helps show where Jeffrey Escoffier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jeffrey Escoffier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jeffrey Escoffier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jeffrey Escoffier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jeffrey Escoffier. Jeffrey Escoffier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 39 | |
| 8 | 66 | |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | The Invention of Safer Sex:: Vernacular Knowledge, Gay Politycs and HIV Prevention | 9 |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | John Maynard Keynes | 1 |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 86 | |
| 19 | [Significance and characteristics of enteral nutrition in massive intestinal resections]. | 0 |
| 20 | Stigmas, Work Environment, and Economic Discrimination Against Homosexuals. | 18 |
About Jeffrey Escoffier
Jeffrey Escoffier is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Clinical Psychology and Music, having authored 25 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (7 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (5 papers) and Sex work and related issues (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (130 citations), Clinical Psychology (105 citations) and Social Psychology (83 citations). Jeffrey Escoffier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include A. Gauthier, M Noirclerc, N. Cano, J. di Costanzo, Fred Wasserman, John Howard, Gilbert Herdt, R Camatte, Helena Wulff and Harvey B. Sarles. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and Gut.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.