Jean‐Philippe Adam
- Oncology top 5%
- Surgery top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Hepatology top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Quentin DenostAlexis LaurentÉric RullierL. ChicheÉtienne BuscailAnne RullierAntónio Sá CunhaBart Van Geluwe
- Topics
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (10 papers)Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (9 papers)Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (9 papers)
- Cited by
- OncologyHepatologySurgery
- Partner nations
- FranceCanadaSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Jean‐Philippe Adam
51 papers receiving 862 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Oncology 591
- Surgery 510
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 239
- Hepatology 136
- Epidemiology 96
Countries citing papers authored by Jean‐Philippe Adam
This map shows the geographic impact of Jean‐Philippe Adam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jean‐Philippe Adam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jean‐Philippe Adam more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jean‐Philippe Adam
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jean‐Philippe Adam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jean‐Philippe Adam. The network helps show where Jean‐Philippe Adam may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jean‐Philippe Adam
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jean‐Philippe Adam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jean‐Philippe Adam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jean‐Philippe Adam. Jean‐Philippe Adam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | Splenic Preservation after Laparoscopic Left Pancreatectomy is associated with Less Postoperative Major Complications. An Analysis of 115 Consecutive Patients | 1 |
| 16 | 66 | |
| 17 | 34 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 22 |
About Jean‐Philippe Adam
Jean‐Philippe Adam is a scholar working on Hepatology, Oncology and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 55 papers that have together received 880 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (10 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (9 papers) and Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (591 citations), Hepatology (136 citations) and Surgery (510 citations). Jean‐Philippe Adam has collaborated with scholars based in France, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Quentin Denost, Alexis Laurent, Éric Rullier, L. Chiche, Étienne Buscail, Anne Rullier, António Sá Cunha, Bart Van Geluwe, Bertrand Célérier and Denis Collet. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Annals of Surgery and Annals of Surgical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.