Jean‐Paul Spire
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Physiology top 10%
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Co-authors
- Vernon L. TowleEve Van CauterJohn D BlackmanSamuel RefetoffK. S. PolonskyDominique RolandKim K. TanDavid Levin
- Topics
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (13 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (8 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesTürkiyeSlovakia
In The Last Decade
Jean‐Paul Spire
48 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
- Cognitive Neuroscience 978
- Physiology 328
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 312
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 298
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 255
Countries citing papers authored by Jean‐Paul Spire
This map shows the geographic impact of Jean‐Paul Spire's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jean‐Paul Spire with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jean‐Paul Spire more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jean‐Paul Spire
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jean‐Paul Spire. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jean‐Paul Spire. The network helps show where Jean‐Paul Spire may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jean‐Paul Spire
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jean‐Paul Spire. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jean‐Paul Spire based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jean‐Paul Spire. Jean‐Paul Spire is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 177 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 52 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 349 | |
| 11 | 326 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 66 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 81 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | Proceedings: Seizures and apnea secondary to neonatal hypoxia. | 5 |
About Jean‐Paul Spire
Jean‐Paul Spire is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Neurology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (13 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (8 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (978 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (312 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (298 citations). Jean‐Paul Spire has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Türkiye and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Vernon L. Towle, Eve Van Cauter, John D Blackman, Samuel Refetoff, K. S. Polonsky, Dominique Roland, Kim K. Tan, David Levin, Raif Çakmur and Ricardo A. Maselli. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Investigation, NeuroImage and Brain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.