Jean‐François Lepage
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Neurology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Genetics top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Hugo ThéoretSara TremblayAllan L. ReissFelipe FregniDavid S. HongÁlvaro Pascual‐LeoneH. ZaïdiDave Saint‐Amour
- Topics
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (15 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (13 papers)Action Observation and Synchronization (12 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of NeuroscienceBloodPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- CanadaFranceUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jean‐François Lepage
107 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
- Cognitive Neuroscience 919
- Neurology 450
- Social Psychology 445
- Genetics 328
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 291
Countries citing papers authored by Jean‐François Lepage
This map shows the geographic impact of Jean‐François Lepage's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jean‐François Lepage with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jean‐François Lepage more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jean‐François Lepage
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jean‐François Lepage. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jean‐François Lepage. The network helps show where Jean‐François Lepage may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jean‐François Lepage
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jean‐François Lepage. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jean‐François Lepage based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jean‐François Lepage. Jean‐François Lepage is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 30 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 35 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 36 | |
| 16 | 35 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | Motor Resonance and Empathy in Children | 0 |
| 20 | 48 |
About Jean‐François Lepage
Jean‐François Lepage is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology and Metals and Alloys, having authored 113 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (15 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (13 papers) and Action Observation and Synchronization (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (450 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (919 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (291 citations). Jean‐François Lepage has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hugo Théoret, Sara Tremblay, Allan L. Reiss, Felipe Fregni, David S. Hong, Álvaro Pascual‐Leone, H. Zaïdi, Dave Saint‐Amour, D. Paulmier and Vincent Beaulé. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Blood and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.