Jean‐Claude Pierrat
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 2%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Ecological Modeling top 1%
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Ecology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jean‐Claude GégoutJonathan LenoirChristian PiedalluRomain BertrandClaude VidalPatrice de RuffrayJean GarbayePascale Frey‐Klett
- Topics
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers)Forest ecology and management (5 papers)Tree-ring climate responses (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceMoroccoNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Jean‐Claude Pierrat
17 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 735
- Plant Science 542
- Ecological Modeling 536
- Global and Planetary Change 421
- Ecology 349
Countries citing papers authored by Jean‐Claude Pierrat
This map shows the geographic impact of Jean‐Claude Pierrat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jean‐Claude Pierrat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jean‐Claude Pierrat more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jean‐Claude Pierrat
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jean‐Claude Pierrat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jean‐Claude Pierrat. The network helps show where Jean‐Claude Pierrat may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jean‐Claude Pierrat
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jean‐Claude Pierrat. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jean‐Claude Pierrat based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jean‐Claude Pierrat. Jean‐Claude Pierrat is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 36 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 49 | |
| 4 | 57 | |
| 5 | Changes in plant community composition lag behind climate warming in lowland forestsbreakdown → | 664 |
| 6 | 64 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 50 | |
| 9 | 116 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 136 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 190 | |
| 14 | 52 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 41 | |
| 17 | 5 |
About Jean‐Claude Pierrat
Jean‐Claude Pierrat is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling and Insect Science, having authored 17 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers), Forest ecology and management (5 papers) and Tree-ring climate responses (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (536 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (735 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (421 citations). Jean‐Claude Pierrat has collaborated with scholars based in France, Morocco and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jean‐Claude Gégout, Jonathan Lenoir, Christian Piedallu, Romain Bertrand, Claude Vidal, Patrice de Ruffray, Jean Garbaye, Pascale Frey‐Klett, Pierre‐Emmanuel Courty and Alain Franc. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, PLoS ONE and Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.