J.E. Moorhouse
- Insect Science top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Genetics
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- John KennedyP. T. HaskellP. S. BeevorBrenda F. NesbittA.C.M. van GerwenL. Barton BrowneDaphne J. OsbornePeggy E. Ellis
- Topics
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (11 papers)Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (9 papers)Animal Behavior and Reproduction (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Insect ScienceEcology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsCellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomCzechia
In The Last Decade
J.E. Moorhouse
15 papers receiving 313 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Insect Science 205
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 151
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 118
- Genetics 111
- Plant Science 85
Countries citing papers authored by J.E. Moorhouse
This map shows the geographic impact of J.E. Moorhouse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.E. Moorhouse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.E. Moorhouse more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J.E. Moorhouse
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.E. Moorhouse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.E. Moorhouse. The network helps show where J.E. Moorhouse may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.E. Moorhouse
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.E. Moorhouse. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.E. Moorhouse based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J.E. Moorhouse. J.E. Moorhouse is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | A practical approach to balancing mineral requirements for the dairy herd. | 0 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | Stopping a walking locust with sound: an analysis of variation in behavioural threshold. | 16 |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | 70 | |
| 13 | 51 | |
| 14 | 31 | |
| 15 | 45 | |
| 16 | 44 |
About J.E. Moorhouse
J.E. Moorhouse is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Insect Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 16 papers that have together received 357 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (11 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (9 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (205 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (151 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (118 citations). J.E. Moorhouse has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include John Kennedy, P. T. Haskell, P. S. Beevor, Brenda F. Nesbitt, A.C.M. van Gerwen, L. Barton Browne, Daphne J. Osborne, Peggy E. Ellis, D. B. Carlisle and A. R. Ludlow. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Animal Behaviour and Journal of Experimental Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.