J.C. Doelman

480 citations
8 papers · 358 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

J.C. Doelman

8 papers receiving 340 citations

Peers

J.C. Doelman
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 255
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 214
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 81
  • Toxicology 11
  • Genetics 67
Replace E.L. Mullens with:
E.L. Mullens United Kingdom
Leonor Cabral‐Lim Philippines
Arun Mistry United Kingdom
Evren Burakgazi-Dalkilic United States
Daniel Beaumont France
A. Schellekens Netherlands
J C Sánchez-Alvarez Spain
A. Scaramelli Uruguay
Manuel Nieto Barrera Spain
Takuji Nishida Japan
J.C. Doelman relative to E.L. Mullens United Kingdom E.L. Mullens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
E.L. Mullens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.C. Doelman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.C. Doelman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.C. Doelman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.C. Doelman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.C. Doelman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.C. Doelman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.C. Doelman. The network helps show where J.C. Doelman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J.C. Doelman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.C. Doelman Line = papers co-authored together J.C. Doelman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2000156
2 200674
3 199844
4 200929
5 200423
6 199820
7 201110
8 19962

About J.C. Doelman

J.C. Doelman is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Genetics, Molecular Biology and Neurology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 358 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (4 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (4 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2 papers), Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (1 paper), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper), Tattoo and Body Piercing Complications (1 paper) and Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (255 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (214 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (81 citations), Toxicology (11 citations) and Genetics (67 citations). J.C. Doelman has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Hungary and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Albert P. Aldenkamp, J.A.R.J. Hulsman, Gerrit‐Jan de Haan, Koos Keizer, Cees A. van Donselaar, Sabine G. Uijl, Johannes A. Carpay, Charles J. Vecht, Cristiana Gassmann-Mayer and David Chadwick. Their work appears in journals such as Epilepsia, Seizure, European Journal of Neurology, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact