Jay Pendse
About
In The Last Decade
Jay Pendse
11 papers receiving 595 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Cell Biology 256
- Molecular Biology 162
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 122
- Biomedical Engineering 99
- Aging 91
Countries citing papers authored by Jay Pendse
This map shows the geographic impact of Jay Pendse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay Pendse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay Pendse more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jay Pendse
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay Pendse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay Pendse. The network helps show where Jay Pendse may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jay Pendse
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jay Pendse. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jay Pendse based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jay Pendse. Jay Pendse is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 44 | |
| 7 | 36 | |
| 8 | 191 | |
| 9 | 43 | |
| 10 | 51 | |
| 11 | 36 | |
| 12 | 185 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.