Jay C. Weber

868 citations
8 papers · 523 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Jay C. Weber

8 papers receiving 433 citations

Peers

Jay C. Weber
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 227
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 123
  • Management Information Systems 99
  • Artificial Intelligence 248
  • Software 18
Replace Robert S. Engelmore with:
Robert S. Engelmore United States
Nenad Ivezic United States
Julita Bermejo–Alonso Spain
Francisco Restivo Portugal
K. Suzanne Barber United States
Joshua Lubell United States
Somayeh Malakuti Germany
S.R.T. Kumara United States
Peter Göhner Germany
Thomas Goldschmidt Germany
Jay C. Weber relative to Robert S. Engelmore United States Robert S. Engelmore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Robert S. Engelmore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay C. Weber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay C. Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay C. Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay C. Weber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay C. Weber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay C. Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay C. Weber. The network helps show where Jay C. Weber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Jay C. Weber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay C. Weber Line = papers co-authored together Jay C. Weber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 1993384
2 1993119
3
A parallel algorithm for statistical belief refinement and its use in causal reasoning
19895
4 19944
5 20074
6
Spreadsheet-like design through knowledge-based tool integration
19924
7
On the representation of concurrent actions in the situation calculus
19902
8
Principles and algorithms for causal reasoning with uncertainty
19901

About Jay C. Weber

Jay C. Weber is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Management Science and Operations Research, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Management Information Systems, having authored 8 papers that have together received 523 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (2 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (2 papers), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (2 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (2 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (1 paper), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (1 paper), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (1 paper) and Mobile Agent-Based Network Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (227 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (123 citations), Management Information Systems (99 citations), Artificial Intelligence (248 citations) and Software (18 citations). Jay C. Weber has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jay M. Tenenbaum, Thomas Gruber, R. Fikes, Robert S. Engelmore, Mark R. Cutkosky, Michael Genesereth, James G. McGuire, Daniel Kuokka, Gregory R. Olsen and Richard N. Pelavin. Their work appears in journals such as Computer, Concurrent Engineering, Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) and International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact