Jasper Poort
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Pieter R. RoelfsemaMatthew W. SelfChris van der TogtTimo van KerkoerleBruno DagninoManeesh SahaniArne F. MeyerJohn O’Keefe
- Topics
- Neural dynamics and brain function (15 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (10 papers)Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Jasper Poort
18 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.6k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 740
- Molecular Biology 165
- Sensory Systems 126
- Social Psychology 73
Countries citing papers authored by Jasper Poort
This map shows the geographic impact of Jasper Poort's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jasper Poort with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jasper Poort more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jasper Poort
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jasper Poort. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jasper Poort. The network helps show where Jasper Poort may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jasper Poort
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jasper Poort. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jasper Poort based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jasper Poort. Jasper Poort is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 34 | |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 98 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | 123 | |
| 10 | 97 | |
| 11 | 55 | |
| 12 | 258 | |
| 13 | Alpha and gamma oscillations characterize feedback and feedforward processing in monkey visual cortexbreakdown → | 587 |
| 14 | 55 | |
| 15 | 161 | |
| 16 | 85 | |
| 17 | 50 | |
| 18 | 47 |
About Jasper Poort
Jasper Poort is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Sensory Systems, having authored 18 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (15 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (10 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.6k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (740 citations) and Sensory Systems (126 citations). Jasper Poort has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Pieter R. Roelfsema, Matthew W. Self, Chris van der Togt, Timo van Kerkoerle, Bruno Dagnino, Maneesh Sahani, Arne F. Meyer, John O’Keefe, Thomas D. Mrsic‐Flogel and Adil G. Khan. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.